Design an Optimum Highway Route using Remote Sensing Data and GIS-Based Least Cost Path Model, Case of Minya-Ras Ghareb and Minya-Wahat-Bawiti Highway Routes, Egypt
Abstract
The traditional method of aligning highways is a tedious, time-consuming process, and needs a lot of manual work, expensive consuming and complicated process, where numerous environmental issues need to be addressed. The problem is exacerbated where the alignment is influenced by the location of services, existing roads, and buildings. Therefore, there is a great need to adopt new technologies that save time and money in designing and assessment of highway paths. Remote Sensing and GIS make the highway alignment most appropriate avoiding vulnerable high-risk zones such as sand dunes, stream crossing, fault zones, etc….in addition to considering environmental protection constraints and cost savings. It needs less manpower, less time consuming and less cost. In this context, a survey was conducted to determine the factors that affect the process of choosing the path of roads through the previous literature and a panel of experts. Minya Ras-Gharib road in the Eastern Desert of Egypt and Minya Wahat Bawiti road in the Western Desert of Egypt as a case study. Remotely sensing techniques, Landsat 8 and digital elevation models were used to produce land use maps, sand dunes, existing roads, slopes, and flood sites. In addition, thematic maps such as rock type, faults, protectorates. Cost factors were determined and cost surface for each factor was established, standardized, weighed and aggregated based on previous literature. A pairwise comparison is used to determine the weight of factors. These weighted factors /criteria maps were combined to create the least cost surface map. Four visions were modeled: an economic vision, an environmental vision, an equal vision, and economy only vision. A comparison was made between the four-route using the DEFINITE software.The equal-weights route was the best route. A comparison was made between the equal-weight route and the existing route.The results of the comparison show that the recommended route save about 48% for the road of Minya Ras Gharib and save about 33 % for the road of Minya Wahat Bawiti compared to the existing road, in addition to saving the time, effort and cost.References
H. A. Effat and O. A. Hassan, “Designing and evaluation of three alternatives highway routes using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the least-cost path analysis, application in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt,” Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Sp. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 141–151, 2013.
E. Basheer and S. Dawwas, “GIS as a Tool for Route Location and Highway Alignment,” 2005.
A. Djenaliev, “Multi-criteria decision making and GIS for railroad planning in Kyrgyzstan,” 2007.
S. Bagli, D. Geneletti, and F. Orsi, “Routeing of power lines through least-cost path analysis and multicriteria evaluation to minimise environmental impacts,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 234–239, 2011.
E. ArcGIS, “Version 10,” Redlands ESRI, 2010.
A. Laskar, “Integrating GIS and multicriteria decision making techniques for land resource planning,” 2003.
J. Malczewski, GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
T. L. Saaty, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.,” 1980.
S. C. Feldman, R. E. Pelletier, E. Waker, J. C. Smoot, and D. Ahl, “A Prototype for Pipeline Routing Using Remotely Sensed Data and Geographic Information System Analysis Commercial Remote Sensing Of&e, Stennis Space Cen- ter, Mississippi *Lockheed Stennis Operations, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi,” vol. 53, pp. 123–131, 1995.
S. Sadek, M. Bedran, and I. Kaysi, “GIS Platform for Multicriteria Evaluation of Route Alignments,” J. Transp. Eng., vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 144–151, Mar. 1999.
K. Bailey, “Development and application of a GIS/ multi-criteria corridor evaluation methodology,” 2003.
E. Saha, A. K., Arora, M. K., Gupta, R. P., Virdi, M. L., and Csaplovics, “‘GIS-Based route planning in landslide-prone areas.,’” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., vol. 19, 2005.
V. Yildirim, “Development of a raster based dynamic model with geographical information system for the determination of natural gas transmission pipelines.” PhD thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey, 2009.
M. Diefallah, A. Ragab, A. Ragheb, and A. Abdelkarim, “A Case Study for Best Path Selection Using Integrated GIS-Multicriteria Decision Approach,” Surv. L. Inf. Sci., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 83–96, 2017.
U. Abdelaziz, “Rural highway alignment selection by implementation of a gis methodology and multi-criteria decision making,” 2013.
I. Shaker, H. Effat, A. Ragab, and A. Hamdy, “Multi Criteria Geographic Information System Analysis for Sustainable Development in North Sinai - EGYPT,” vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 141–155, 2016.
E. Triantaphyllou and S. H. Mann, “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision Making in Engineering Applications : Some Challenges,” Inter’l J. Ind. Eng. Appl. Pract., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 1995.
Janssen, R., Herwijnen, M., “Decision Support for Discrete Choice Problems: The Definite Programs. Institute of Environmental Studies. Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (Email: DEFINITE@ivm.vu.nl).,” 1994.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.
