Effect of Cyanobacteria Application as Biofertilizer on Growth, Yield and Yield Components of Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativaL.) on Soils of Ethiopia

  • Muluneh Menamo
  • Zinabu Wolde
Keywords: biofertilizer, Cynanobacteria, lettuce, N-fixing

Abstract

Nitrogen is an important element for plant growth and its availability in sufficient amount boosts production per unit area, increases the total supply of food and contributes to the quality of food. However, resource poor farmers in the tropics especially in Ethiopia are not able to use enough amount of inorganic N fertilizer for crop production due to high cost, and hence looking for alternative means of improving available nitrogen in the soil is crucial. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the potential of cyanobacteria biofertilizer for growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.).  A factorial combinations of two soil types with contrasting reaction (Ziway pH of 8.0 and Yirgalem pH of 5.7) and five different N sources (dried and  liquid cyanobacteria, urea, compost and a negative control) were laid out in a complete randomized design with three replications in the green house. The ANOVA revealed that the maximum value on all yield and yield parameters of the lettuce crop were obtained by application of the dried cyanobacteria. The dried cyanobacteria increased the number of leaf, leaf area, leaf length, fresh weight of the leaf, leaf dry weight and the root dry weight of the lettuce by 159.5, 112.4, 80.8, 48, 137.5 and 110%, respectively, over the control. Similarly, as compared to the control treatments, incorporation of the dried cyanobacteria biofertilizer to the soil increased the lettuce plant tissue P, Zn and Fe concentration by 38.54, 18.95 and 105.57%, respectively. Also, the lettuce tissue N concentration increased by 33.3% over the control due to the application of the liquid cyanobacteria while this was increased by 6.25% for dried cyanobacteria application.Similarly, the soil chemical properties and fertility parameters significantly changed by the application of the cyanobacteria biofertilizer treatments. Thus, as compared to the control, total soil N increased by 0.27%, by applying the dried cyanobacteria. However, this study should be verified under field condition to consolidate our findings in the greenhouse.

References

[1] Work, J. Carew, Vegetable Production and Marketing, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons Inc., N.Y., 1955, p. 537.
[2] Islam, M. S. & Noor, S. 1982. Performance of ground nut under different levels of phosphate fertilizer in flood plain soil of Jamalpur, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Resources, 7(1): 35-40.
[3] Uddin, M. J., Ali, M. S., Hossain, M. A., Ahmed, M. U. &Haque, M. M. (1995). Effect of boron grain set, yield and some other parameters of wheat cultivars. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2: 179-184.
[4] Vitousek, P.M., R. Naylor, T. Crews, M.B. David, L.E. Drinkwater, E. Holland, P.J. Johnes, J Katzenberger, L.A. Martinelli, P.A. Matson, G. Nziguheba, D. Ojima, C.A. Palm, G.P. Robertson, P.A. Sanchez, A.R. Townsend, and F.S. Zhang. 2009. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science 324:1519-1520.
[5]Wassie, H, M. Thongchai, O. Yongyuthand V. Verasan. 2005. Investigation on the Nitrification Potential of Some Soils in the Southern and Central Ethiopia. P: 118.
[6] Girmaabera,Endalkachawwolda-meskel and L.R. Bakken. 2012. Carbon and nitrogen mineralization dynamics in different soils of the tropics amended with legume residue and contrasting soil moisture contents. Biology and fertility of soils. 48:51-66.
[7] SahlemedhinSerstu and TayeBekele. 2000. Procedures for Soil and Plant Analysis. Technical Paper No. 74.
[8] Rogers S.L. and Burns, R.G. 1994. Changes in aggregate stability,nutrient status, indigenous microbial populations, andseedling emergence, following inoculation of soil withNostocmuscorum. BiolFert Soils 18:209–215.
[9] Havalin, J, L, J. D. Beaton,S.L. Tisdale and W.L. Nilson.2010. Soil fertility and fertilizer: An introduction to nutrient management. 10th ed. Prentice Hail. Upper saddle River, New Jersey
[10] Tawfik, K.M.1984.Ecological and phytochemical studies on some Aloe species. (Ph.D. Thesis) Women's College, Ain Shams Univ., Botany Department.
[11] Ercoli, L.L., Lulli, M., Mariotti, A. Masoni and I. Arduini.2008. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. Eur. J. Agron. 28:138–147.
[12]Hashem, M. A. 2001. Problems and prospects of cyanobacterialbiofertilizersfor rice cultivation. Australian journal of plant physiology.28: 881-888.
[13]Roger, P.A.; Santiago-Ardales, S.; Reddy, P.M. and Watanabe, I. 1987. The abundance of heterocystous blue-green algae in rice soils and inocula used for application in rice fields. Biol. Fertility Soils 5:98-105.
[14] Spedding, C.R.W., J.M. Walsingham, and A.M. Hoxey. 1981. Biological Efficiency in Agriculture. Academic Press, London. 383 pp.
[15]Chauhan, K. L.and A. B. Gupta. 1984. Cytokinin like substance in blue-green algae. Curr. Sci. 53: 324-325.
[16]Jacq, A. & P. A. Roger. 1977. Decrease of losses due to sulphate reducing processes in the super atmosphere of rice by pre-soaking seeds in a culture of blue-green algae. Cah. O.R.S.T.O.M., Ser. Biol. 12: 101-108 (in French, with an English summary).
[17] Brady,N.C.and R.R.Weil.2002.The nature and properties of soil.13thed.pearsonEducation,Inc.uper Saddle river,NewJeresy. Pp143-192.
Published
2015-06-17