Adaptation Conflicts of Heterogeneous Devices in Iot Smart-Home

Authors

  • Motaz Osman Ahmed Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, SUDAN
  • Associated professor Salah Elfaki Elrofai Elfaki Sudan University of Science and Technology, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, SUDAN

Keywords:

IoT, Smart-Home, Conflict, PnP, Smart Transducer, Interoperability, Integration, Adaptation, SUR

Abstract

A promising technology such as Internet-of-Things have been introduced into traditional homes, buildings and cities to become smart and offer a wide range of services to simplify and enhance people’s lifestyle, a complex rule structure with a large number of sensing and actuating devices increases the chances of creating rules with faulty behaviors. Detection of sophisticated conflicts in an IoT system is one example of such faulty systems. In this paper, a mechanism is presented to detect such sophisticated conflicts among multi-resident smart-home services. Formally a model considering the functional properties of devices to distinguish a specific new kind of conflicts among the other basic types. Service User Regularity (SUR) conflict detection algorithm is proposed to trace resident habitual usage and behaviour conflicts and regulate them within the rules of the smart-home IoT-system. The system achieved good result; it could detect a reasonable number of targeted type conflicts within a synthesized data set.

References

. S. H. Shah and I. Yaqoob, “A survey: Internet of Things (IOT) technologies, applications and challenges,” 2016 4th IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Energy Grid Eng. SEGE 2016, vol. i, pp. 381–385, 2016.

. T. Perumal, A. R. Ramli, and C. Y. Leong, “Interoperability framework for smart home systems,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1607–1611, 2011.

. B. Huang, A. Bouguettaya, and S. Mistry, “Conflict Detection of IoT Services in Smart Home,” arXiv, 2020.

. T. Perumal, M. N. Sulaiman, S. K. Datta, T. Ramachandran, and C. Y. Leong, “Rule-based conflict resolution framework for Internet of Things device management in smart home environment,” 2016 IEEE 5th Glob. Conf. Consum. Electron. GCCE 2016, pp. 1–2, 2016.

. T. Shah, S. Venkatesan, T. Ngo, Pratima, and K. Neelamegam, “Conflict Detection in Rule Based IoT Systems,” 2019 IEEE 10th Annu. Inf. Technol. Electron. Mob. Commun. Conf. IEMCON 2019, pp. 276–284, 2019.

. D. Chaki and A. Bouguettaya, “Fine-grained Conflict Detection of IoT Services,” arXiv, pp. 321–328, 2020.

. D. Chaki, A. Bouguettaya, and S. Mistry, “A Conflict Detection Framework for IoT Services in Multi-resident Smart Homes,” arXiv, 2020.

. D. C. among A. D. in S. Homes, “Detecting Conflicts among Autonomous Devices in Smart Homes,” 2019.

. H. Oh, S. Ahn, and J. K. Choi, “Mashup Service Conflict Detection and Visualization Method for Internet of Things,” no. Gcce, pp. 4–5, 2017.

. H. Aloulou, R. Endelin, M. Mokhtari, B. Abdulrazak, F. Kaddachi, and J. Bellmunt, “Detecting Inconsistencies in Rule-Based Reasoning for Ambient Intelligence,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Eng. Complex Comput. Syst. ICECCS, vol. 0, pp. 235–240, 2016.

. M. Yagita, F. Ishikawa, and S. Honiden, “An Application Conflict Detection and Resolution System for Smart Homes,” Proc. - Int. Work. Softw. Eng. Smart Cyber-Physical Syst. SEsCPS 2015, pp. 33–39, 2015.

. A. Abusafia, A. Bouguettaya, and S. Mistry, “Incentive-based selection and composition of IoT energy services,” Proc. - 2020 IEEE 13th Int. Conf. Serv. Comput. SCC 2020, pp. 304–311, 2020.

. A. S. Alfakeeh and A. H. Al-Bayatti, “Feature Interactions Detection and Resolution in Smart Homes Systems,” Int. J. Electron. Electr. Eng., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2016.

. M. Ma, S. M. Preum, and J. A. Stankovic, “CityGuard: A watchdog for safety-aware conflict detection in smart cities,” Proc. - 2017 IEEE/ACM 2nd Int. Conf. Internet-of-Things Des. Implementation, IoTDI 2017 (part CPS Week), pp. 259–270, 2017.

. Y. Sun, X. Wang, H. Luo, and X. Li, “Conflict detection scheme based on formal rule model for smart building systems,” IEEE Trans. Human-Machine Syst., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 215–227, 2015.

. M. Nakamura, H. Igaki, and K. I. Matsumoto, “Feature interactions in integrated services of networked home appliances - An object-oriented approach,” Featur. Interact. Telecommun. Softw. Syst. VIII, pp. 236–251, 2005.

. H. Hu et al., “Semantic Web-based policy interaction detection method with rules in smart home for detecting interactions among user policies,” IET Commun., vol. 5, no. 17, pp. 2451–2460, 2011.

. T. Perumal, M. N. Sulaiman, and C. Y. Leong, “ECA-based interoperability framework for intelligent building,” Autom. Constr., vol. 31, pp. 274–280, 2013.

. K. Kesehatan, “No TitleΕΛΕΝΗ,” Αγαη, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 55, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-21

How to Cite

Ahmed, M. O. ., & Elfaki, A. professor S. E. E. . (2021). Adaptation Conflicts of Heterogeneous Devices in Iot Smart-Home. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 81(1), 64–78. Retrieved from https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/6970

Issue

Vol. 81 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.