Personalized Learning in Education
AbstractPersonalized learning has been from the time past as learning which focuses on aptitudes, interests, and needs of a learner. Owing to its importance in the teaching and learning world, it has availed manifold popularity. Ten years ago, many nations such as the United Kingdom, USA, New Zealand as well as Australia have integrated this mode of training. It is seen and promoted as the major learning technique for preparing the youths towards the 21st-century pre-requisites as well as the expectations of the society from them, . According to some scholars, it is very understandable in the aspect of vocational learning . Personalized learning customizes learning as per a specific student’s needs, skills, strengths as well as interests in these techniques. Each scholar is given an erudition scheme which is as per his/her best process of learning as well as knowledge. However, personalized learning cannot replace other strategies like a 504 plan, IEP or an intervention program. This article tends to deal with all aspects of personalized learning which comprises a brief introduction of the subject matter of personalized learning, and some of the reviews of the literature on personalized learning. The write up will also focus on why personalized learning really matters, what is obtainable and what is not in the field of personalized learning. The write up will also deal with the best guides to personalized learning, especially educational elements. Some examples of what personalized learning is like, as well as some personalized learning strategies with samples, will be looked into. Finally, the article will run through the summary of the subject matter of personalized learning and its importance in the educational field.
. Bentley, T. and R. Miller (2004). Personalisation; Creating the Ingredients for Systematic and Society-wide Change. Personalised Learning Conference, London, 17-18 May
. Ducket & Jones (2006).Personalised learning: meeting individual learner needs. Information Services Learning and Skills Network Regent Arcade House 19–25 Argyll Street London W1F 7LS. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/104390.
. American Institutes for Research. (2014, September). Does Deeper Learning Improve Student Outcomes? Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/sites/default/files/AIR%20Deeper%20Learning%20Summary.pdf
. Baker, R. (2016). Using learning analytics in personalized learning. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools (pp. 165–174). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from www.centeril.org
. Birkerts, S. (2015). Change the Subject: Art and Attention in the Internet Age. Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press.
. Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning, theory and practice (pp. 47-63). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook l: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
. Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
. Brown, M. (1994). An introduction to the discourse on competency-based training (CBT). In Deakin University Course Development Centre (Ed.), A collection of readings related to competency-based training (pp. 1–17). Victoria, Australia: Victorian Education Foundation, Deakin University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384695.pdf
. Carmichael, J. W., Bauer, J. D., Hunter, J. R., & Sevenair, J. P. (1988). An assessment of a premedical program in terms of its ability to serve Black Americans. Journal of the National Medical Association, 80(10), 1094–.1104
. Conley, D. T., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Creating systems of assessment for deeper learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Retrieved from https:// edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/creating-systems-assessment-deeperlearning_0.pdf
. Crawford, M. B. (2015). The world beyond your head: On becoming an individual in an age of distraction. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
. Culatta, R. (2013, February 6). Reimagining Learning [Video file]. Boston, MA: TEDxBeaconStreet. Retrieved from http://www.tedxbeaconstreet.com/richard-culatta/
. Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York, NY: Holt-Rinehart Winston.
. Gagne, R. M. (1970). The conditions of learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt-Rinehart Winston.
. Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1475–1490.
. Layng, R. R., & Robbins, J. K. (2012, November). Toward new consequentialism: Nonlinear contingency analysis and the understanding of moral behaviour. Poster presented at the Theory and Philosophy Conference, Association for Behavior Analysis International, Santa Fe, NM.
. Layng, T. V. J. (2006). Emotions and emotional behavior: A constructional approach to understanding some social benefits of aggression. Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 155–170.
. Layng, T. V. J. (2009). The search for an effective clinical behavior analysis: The nonlinear thinking of Israel Goldiamond. The Behavior Analyst, 32(1), 163–184.
. Layng, T. V. J. (2012). Understanding concepts: Implications for science teaching. Boston, MA: Mimio. Retrieved from http://www.mimio.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/Partner-Resources/ Whitepapers/whitepaper_science_teaching.ashx Converging Qualities of Personal Competencies 35
. Layng, T. V. J. (2014a). Learning science design and development requirements: An update of Hendrix and Tiemann’s “designs for designers.” Mexican Journal of Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 39–57.
. Layng, T. V. J. (2014b, November). Social policy and terrorism: Contingencies of exclusion. Invited address presented at the 11th International Congress on Behavioral Studies, Milan, Italy.
. Layng, T. V. J., & Twyman, J. S. (2013). Education + technology + innovation = learning? In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on innovations in learning (pp. 133–148). Philadelphia, PA: Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org
. Markle, S. M. (1982). Formulating clear objectives. Unpublished self-instructional program.
. McClarty, K. & Gaertner, M. (2015). Measuring Mastery: Best Practices for Assessment in Competency-Based Education. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.” American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
. Mulder, M., Weigel, T., & Collins, K. (2006). The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states—A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(1), 65–85.
. Mechner, F. (1962). Behavioral analysis for programmers. New York, NY: Basic Systems.
. Mechner, F. (1965). Science education and behaviour technology. In R. Glasser (Ed.), Teaching machines and programmed learning, II: Data and directions (pp. 461–484). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
. Mechner, F. (1994). Learning and practicing skilled performance. New York, NY: The Mechner Foundation.
. Mechner, F., Fredrick, T., & Jenkins, T. (2013). How can one specify and teach thinking skills? European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 14(2), 285–293.
. Merrill, M. D. (1971). Necessary psychological conditions for defining instructional outcomes. In M. D. Merrill (Ed.), Instructional design: Readings (pp. 173–184).
. National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium. (n.d.). Career clusters knowledge & skills statements. Silver Spring, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.careertech.org/knowledge-skills-statements
. National Occupational Competency Testing Institute. (n.d.). About NOCTI. Big Rapids, MI: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nocti.org/aboutnocti.cfm
. National Skill Standards Board. (2000). Skill scales companion guide. Washington, DC:
. Oakes, J. (1995). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
. O’Neil, J. (1992). On tracking and individual differences: A conversation with Jeannie Oakes. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 18–21. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct92/vol50/num02/On-Tracking-andIndividual-Differences@-A-Conversation-with-Jeannie-Oakes.aspx Handbook on Personalized Learning 18
. Redding, S. (2013). Through the student’s eyes: A perspective on personalized learning. Philadelphia, PA: Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/publications/2013_09_Through_the_Eyes.pdf
. Redding, S. (2014). Personal competencies in personalized learning. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/publications/Personalized_Learning.pdf
. Redding, S. (2014a). Personal competency: A framework for building students’ capacity to learn. Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/publications/Personal_Compentency_Framework.pdf
. Sandler, S. (2012). People v. ‘personalization’: Retaining the human element in the high-tech era of education. Education Week, 31(22), 20–22.
. Schmoker, M. (2010). When pedagogic fads trump priorities. Education Week, 30(5), 22–23. Retrieved from http://mikeschmoker.com/pedagogic-fads.html
. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York, NY: Appleton-Century Croft.
. Taylor, R., & Gebre, A. (2016). Teacher-student relations and personalized learning: Implications of personal and contextual variables. In M. Murphy, S. Redding, & J. Twyman (Eds.), Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools. Philadelphia, PA: Center on Innovations in Learning.
. Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1973). Remodeling a model: An elaborated hierarchy of types of learning. Educational Psychologist, 10(3), 147–158.
. Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1991). Analyzing instructional content. Seattle, WA: Morningside Press.
. Tomlinson, C. (1995). How to differentiate instruction in the mixed-ability classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
. Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
. Twyman, J. (2014). Competency-based education: Supporting personalized learning. Philadelphia, PA: Center on Innovations in Learning. Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/connect/resources/Connect_CB_Education_Twyman-2014_11.12.pdf
. Twyman, J., & Redding, S. (2015). Personal competencies/Personalized learning: Lesson plan reflection guide. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/ToolsTrainingModules/assets/personalizedlearninglessonplanreflection.pdf
. U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Competency-based learning or personalized learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/oii-news/competency-based-learning-or-personalized-learning
. Wang, M. C. (1992). Adaptive education strategies: Building on diversity. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. (2013, April). Deeper Learning Competencies. Retrieved from https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Deeper_Learning_Defined__April_2013.pdf
. Yonezawa, S., McClure, L., & Jones, M. (2012.). Personalization in Schools. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future. Retrieved from http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/sites/scl.dl-dev.com/files/Personalization%20in%20Schools.pdf
Copyright (c) 2020 American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.