A Assessment Model for Electronic Health Management Information Systems Success in a Developing Country Context: A Case of the Greater Bushenyi Districts in Uganda
AbstractElectronic information systems are gradually replacing traditional information systems in most public and private organisations in developing countries. This is motivated by the wide acceptance of use of information technology at almost all levels of Government institutions and private institutions. No matter the trends in the economy the organisations strive to know the investments in information systems (IS) to determine their success because they are often implemented to solve a particular business need or opportunity. Thus imperative to establish the IS effectiveness for every investment in the IS project given the evolution of information technology. This paper aims at examining the DeLone and MacLean model, 2016 for suitability of assessment electronic information systems success in a developing country context looking at the case of Uganda. Guided by the pragmatic thought and a rare abductive research approach which combines inductive and deductive perspectives were used. It utilized the concurrent transformative research designs for data collection.
. Brierley, J.Alvi. (2017). The role of a pragmatist paradigm when adopting mixed methods in behavioural accounting research. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 6 (2). pp. 140-154. ISSN 1753-1969
. Chinecherem Umezuruike, Wilson Nwankwo, Margaret Kareyo (2017). Implementation Challenges of Health Management Information Systems in Uganda: A Review, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST) ISSN: 2458-9403 Vol. 4 Issue 7, July – 2017
. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2008) Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone& McLean Information Systems Success Model.International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9: 31-47.
. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. (2003) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3: 60-95.
. DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19: 9-30.
. Hussein Muhaise and Annabella Habinka Ejiri (2016) Factors influencing District Health information software version 2.0 success. A case of the greater Bushenyi Districts, American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology and Sciences, Vol 26, pg 166 -178
. Hussein Muhaise and Margaret Kareyo (2017) Electronic Health Information Systems critical implementation issues (eHMIS): District Health Information software version 2.0 in the greater Bushenyi Districts, American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology and Sciences, Vol 34, pg 205-212
. Laudon, C.K. and Laudon, J.P. (2012). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. 12th Edition. Pearson. Upper Saddle. New Jersey.
. Maxwell, J.A. and Mittapalli, K.M. (2010) ‘Realism as a stance for mixed methods research’, in Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds): SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2nd edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
. Ministry of Health (2014). The Health Management Information System (Volume 1), Health unit and Community procedure manual, available at Ministry of Health Resource Centre accessed 15/09/2018
. Ministry of Health, Health Systems 20/20, Makerere University School of Public Health: Uganda Health Systems Assessment 2011. Kampala, Uganda and Bethesda, MD: Health Systems 20/20 Project, Abt Associates Inc; Available at: http://health.go.ug/docs/hsa.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2017.
. Namakula ., S, Kituyi G, (2014). Examining health information systems success factors in
. Uganda health care systems. Journal of global health care systems. 4: 1
. Omwansa, T. K., (2012).Modelling Adoption of Mobile Money by the Poor In Kenya. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/10138/Final%20Thesis.pdf?s equence=1
. Ojo. I Adebowale, (2017) validation of the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Sucess Model. Health Information Resarch. 2017 January, 23(1)60-66
. Roberta Heale, Alison Twycross (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies, Evid Based Nurs, volume 18, No. 3
. Shumaila Memon, Sumera Umrani and Habibullah Pathan (2017) Application of constant comparison method in social sciences: a useful technique to analyze interviews, Grassroots, Vol 51, No. 1
. Tilahun, B., & Fritz, F. (2015). Comprehensive Evaluation of Electronic Medical Record System Use and User Satisfaction at Five Low-Resource Setting Hospitals in Ethiopia. JMIR Medical Informatics, 3(2), 22.
. World Bank (2018). Country Classification. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classification. (Retrieved on 28.01.18).
Copyright (c) 2019 American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.