A Pragma-Semantic Study of Former President Mugabe’s Speech at the 26th Summit of the OAU at Addis-Ababa (Ethiopia, 30/01/2016)
AbstractThe issue addressed in this article is twofold; first of all, it seeks to show how pragmatics and semantics are two inseparable fields, for both of them are related to meaning. Nevertheless, needless to say, meaning in pragmatics seems to be more meaningful since it relates to real situations. In addition, the work depicts the language used in political spheres where the former Organization of the African Union (OAU) Chairperson Robert Mugabe displays anger since he is asked to give up the leadership of Zimbabwe, his cake. The speech is a real cacophony: use of non-sentences, banter principle, ellipses and so on; which reveal Mugabe’s uneasiness and of course he is not ready to yield in. To reach the goal assigned to this study, the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used. In addition to the CDA, Speech Act Theory (SAT) was of great deal to depict Mugabe’s sense of irony and lack of politeness. However, Mugabe, the outgoing Chairperson of the OAU, succeeded to call for reforms at the United Nations (UN). Despite his hypocritical attitude, the Africans, i.e. “us” as opposed to “them”, i.e. the Westerners; are shown by the addresser (Mugabe) to be under domination of Europe. Besides, through laments, he clearly demonstrated that the latter are dictators and have no lesson about democracy to give to the former.
. Bhabha, H. K. “Post-colonial authority and post-modern guilt”. In L. Crossberg, P. Nelson, and P. Treichler (eds.). Cultural Studies, London: Routledge, 1992.
Brown, P. and Levinson S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Brown, G. and Yule G. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Chilton, P. Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge, 2004.
Chilton, P. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge., 2007.
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1965.
Crystal, D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th edition, London: Blackwell Publishing. 2008.
Culpeper, J. “Impoliteness an entertainment in the television quiz show: the weakest link”. Journal of Politeness Research 1:35-72. 2005.
Culpeper, J. “Politeness in interaction”. In: Culpeper, J., Katamba, F., Description, Variation and Context. Palgrave, Chapter 31, 2009.
Cutting, J. Pragmatics and Discourse: A resource book for students, London and New York: Routledge, 2002.
Fairclough, N. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism, Overdetermination, Transdisciplinarity, and Textual Analysis”. In: L. Young and C. Harrison (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Continuum, 2004.
Flowerdew, J. Discourse in English Language Education, London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
Fowler, R. Literature as Social Discourse, London: Bastford Academic and Educational Ltd, 1981.
Grice, P. Studies in the way of words, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.
Griffiths, P. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University, 2006.
Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second Edition, London : Edward Arnold, 1994..
Herder, J. G. Une autre philosophie de l’histoire, Paris : Aubier, 1964.
Jorgensen, M. and Phillips, L. J. Discourse as Theory and Method, London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2002.
Leech, G. Semantics, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974.
Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics, London and New York: Longman, 1983.
Leech G. and M. H. Short, Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose, London and New York: Longman, 1981.
Maphosa M; Tshuma, N. & Tcube, G. “Participation of Women in Zimbabwean Politics and Mirage of Gender Equity”, Ubuntu: Journal of Conflict and Social Transformation, Vol. 4, Number 2, pp. 127-159, 2015.
Microsoft® Encarta® 2009.
Moore, M. Stupid White Men, New York: Penguin Books, 2002.
Moreau, D. (n.d.). Raison et comparaison : la genèse du souci comparatiste en éducation, in Education comparée, nouvelle série, 271-296.
Mugabe, R. (2016, Jan. 26). AU Chair Robert Mugabe speech in Addis-Ababa Ethiopia. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNa8bWLCUYU [Nov.17, 2018].
Ngitsi K. and Kiura, K. Critical Approaches in Poetry, Mombasa/Kenya: Cactus East Africa Publishers, 2018.
Ngitsi K. “Obscenity and vulgarity in the language of Ayi Kwei Armah’s The Beautyful Ones Are Not Yet Born: A pragmatic outlook”, in Journal of Oriental and African Studies, vol. 26, 335-350,. 2017b.
Ngitsi K. and Kayisavira, K. “The African Ruler’s Policy of ‘Divide and Rule’: A Socio-political Criticism through some Novels”, in Journal of Oriental and African Studies, vol. 19, 255-265,. 2010.
Ngitsi K. and Mukokoma, K. “Disruption of Society as viewed in some African Poems”, in Journal of Oriental and African Studies, vol. 16, 271-289, 2007.
Ngugi wa Thiong’o. “Literature in Schools”, In: C. Brumfit and C. Ronald (eds.), Literature and Language Teaching, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 223-229.
Norton, B. Identity and language learning: gender, ethnicity and educational change, London: Harlow, 2000.
Orwell, G. Animal Farm, London: Penguin Books, 1945.
Portner, P. Modality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Radford, A. et al. Linguistics: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Ferdinand de Saussure. Course in General Linguistics (trans. Roy Harris), London: Duckworth, 1983.
Stainton, R. J. The Pragmatics of Non-sentences, pp.265-287: In Horn, L.R. and Gregory Ward (Eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2006.
Suurmond, J. M. (2005, March). “Our Talk and Walk: Discourse Analysis and Conflict Studies”, from http://www.clingendael.nl/cscp retrieved 22/09/2015.
Syal, P. & Jindal, D.V. An Introduction to Linguistics: Language, Grammar and Semantics, New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, 2002.
van Dijik, T. A. “Discourse semantics and ideology”, Discourse and Society, 6 (2):243-289, 1995.
van Dijk, T.A (1998, June) “Critical Discourse Analysis”. Available: http://www.hum.uva.nl/teun/cda.htm [Oct. 28, 2018].
Widdowson, H.G. Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature London: Longman Group Ltd, 1975.
Wodak, R. “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry”. Pragmatics and Cognition 15:1, 203-225, 2007.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.