Marketing Information Systems and Sustainable Consumption
AbstractSustainable consumption is an emerging issue in many economies and this had been evidenced by grouping such as United Nations which has embarked on sustainability programs to ensure effective production and development of individual well-being in the society. Previously, main concern of firms was in satisfaction of needs and wants with less concern of its effect both to the consumers and the business environment. Global conferences have emphasized the need to manage excessive demands and unsustainable lifestyles and redistribution of resources from the developed to developing states globally as to progress regional sustainability both in production and consumption. Among other factors, sustainable consumption in firms can be ensured through measurement of operations and activities as well as information flow from the market to the firm and vice versa. The study focused on the marketing information systems. The main objectives of the study include: to review extant theoretical literature on the constructs of marketing information systems and sustainable consumption; to review extant empirical literature on the constructs of marketing information systems and sustainable consumption; to identify emerging theoretical and empirical gaps that forms the basis of future research on marketing information systems and sustainable consumption and to propose a conceptual model to respond to the gaps identified in the study. The literature reviewed suggested existence of relationship between MkIS and sustainable consumption. Even though various models and theories identify with the relationship, there is need for a unified model that explains the relationship. Further, from the empirical review, it emerged that the key elements that determine the effectiveness of a marketing information system is the information, the infrastructure of the MkIS, and the marketing orientation where the product offers are of superior value than that of competitors.The main empirical gap identified was that firms that practiced sustainable consumption possessed sustainable consumption models, however the models did not translate to firm market performance and hence the need to establish impact of MkIS on sustainable consumption. Further, firms that practiced non sustainable consumption were viewed to be more profitable while those that practiced sustainable consumption cited the processes to be costly and unprofitable. The study developed a conceptual model should future researchers opt to conduct an empirical review to validate the study.
Arbuthnott, K. D. (2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. . International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education , 152-163.
Brien, R., & Stafford, J. E. (1968). Marketing information systems: A new dimension to marketing research. Journal of Marketing,, 32, 19-23.
Emery, B. (2012). Sustainable Marketing. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
FAO. (2017). FAO Corporate Document Resipository. Retrieved from Marketing research and information systems. (Marketing and Agribusiness Texts . Marketing research and information systems. : http://www.fao.org/docrep/W3241E/w3241e0a.htm
Farahnaz, S., Kimiafar, K., & Shakeri, M. T. (2013). Determining of factors influencing the success and failure of hospital information system and their evaluation methods: A systematic review. Iranian Red
Fischer, D., Böhme, T., & Geiger, S. M. (2017). Measuring young consumers’ sustainable consumption behavior: development and valiidation of the YCSCB. Young Consumers, 18 (3), 312-326.
Fuentes, C. (2015). Images of repsonsible consumers: Organizing the marketing of sustainability. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43 (4/5), 367-385.
Gavilia, J., & Khan, J. (2001). Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Rondoˆnia, Brazil. University of Chicago Journals .
Gunn, M., & Mont, O. (2014). Choice editing as a retailers’ tool for sustainable consumption. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42 (6), 464-481.
Heydari, N., Shafeai, R., & Ahmadi, F. (2012). Considering the role of Marketing Information System on elevation of efficiency. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (6), 6143-6151.
Hines, J., Hungerford, H., & Tomera, A. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible pro-environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education , 1-8.
Hunt, S., & Morgan, R. M. (1995). The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of Marketing, 59, 1-15.
Hunt, S., & Morgan, R. M. (1996). The Resource-advantage theory of competition: dynamica, path dependencies and evolutionary dimensions. Journal of Marketing, 60, 107-14.
Jackson, T. (2005a). Live better by consuming less: Is there "double dividend" in sustainable consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology , 19-36.
Jackson, T. (2005b). Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behavior and behavioral change. DEFRA.
Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2011). Shopping for tomorrow: promoting sustainable consumption within food stores. British Food Journal, 113 (7), 935-948.
Kimball, M. B. (2009). Architecture of Information. Tehran: Islamic Azad University.
Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75 (4), 132-135.
Nkamnebe, A. D. (2011). Sustainability marketing in the emerging markets: imperatives, challenges, and agenda setting. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6 (3), 217-23.
OECD. (2008). OECD Annual Report 2008. OECD.
Seifi, S., Zulkifli, N., Yusuff, R., & Sullaimanol, S. (2012). Information requirements for sustainable consumption. Social Responsibility Journal, 8 (3), 433-441.
Seyfang, G. (2007). Growing sustainable consumption communities: The case of local organic food. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27 (3/4), 120-1.
Suarez, P., Marcote, P., & Mira, R. (2011). Sustainable consumption: A teaching intervention in higher education. International Journal of sustainability in Higher Education , 3-15.
UNDP. (2008). Informe sobre el desarrollo humano 2007-2008. Madrid: UNDP .
UNEP. (2012). UNEP 2011 Annual report. UNEP.
UNEP. (2015). UNEP environmental, social and economic sustainability framework. UNEP.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Gordon, B., & Fred, D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425-478.
Young, W. (2010). Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour when Purchasing Products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20-31.
Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustaianble consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152-165.
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- By submitting the processing fee, it is understood that the author has agreed to our terms and conditions which may change from time to time without any notice.
- It should be clear for authors that the Editor In Chief is responsible for the final decision about the submitted papers; have the right to accept\reject any paper. The Editor In Chief will choose any option from the following to review the submitted papers:A. send the paper to two reviewers, if the results were negative by one reviewer and positive by the other one; then the editor may send the paper for third reviewer or he take immediately the final decision by accepting\rejecting the paper. The Editor In Chief will ask the selected reviewers to present the results within 7 working days, if they were unable to complete the review within the agreed period then the editor have the right to resend the papers for new reviewers using the same procedure. If the Editor In Chief was not able to find suitable reviewers for certain papers then he have the right to accept\reject the paper.B. sends the paper to a selected editorial board member(s). C. the Editor In Chief himself evaluates the paper.
- Author will take the responsibility what so ever if any copyright infringement or any other violation of any law is done by publishing the research work by the author
- Before publishing, author must check whether this journal is accepted by his employer, or any authority he intends to submit his research work. we will not be responsible in this matter.
- If at any time, due to any legal reason, if the journal stops accepting manuscripts or could not publish already accepted manuscripts, we will have the right to cancel all or any one of the manuscripts without any compensation or returning back any kind of processing cost.
- The cost covered in the publication fees is only for online publication of a single manuscript.