Challenges of Performance Appraisal Implementation and their Effects on Service Delivery in Public Secondary Schools in Githunguri Sub-county of Kiambu County, Kenya

Authors

  • Simon K. Kamau Lecturer, Mukuruweini Technical Training Institute, Nyeri County, Kenya
  • Dr. Hannah O. Bula Senior Lecturer, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
  • James O. Oringo Independent Consultant and Lecturer, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

Keywords:

Evaluation, Implementation Challenges, Performance Contract.

Abstract

Performance contract in public service is a freely negotiated performance agreement between the Government, acting as the owner of a Government Agency, and the management of the agency. It is part of the broader public reforms aimed at improving efficiency and effectiveness in the management of public services. In so doing, the process clearly specifies the intentions, obligation and responsibilities of the two parties, that is, the employer and the employee. In Kenya, performance appraisal came into effect in the last two years despite constant resistance from teachers through their unions. The introduction of performance appraisal in the education sector followed public concerns of deteriorating standards of education. It is for this reason that the study sought to evaluate the existing challenges in the implementation of performance appraisal and their effect on service delivery in public secondary schools in Githunguri Sub-county of Kiambu County, Kenya. The specific objectives of the study were to establish; the influences of inadequate training, conflict between appraisers and appraisees and dishonesty in awarding scores, on the implementation of performance contract in public secondary schools in Githunguri Sub-county of Kiambu County, Kenya. The study adopted a survey research design. The target population for the study was 31 public secondary schools, 31 principals and 604 public secondary school teachers employed by the Teachers Service Commission.

The study adopted stratified sampling and simple random techniques to select 20 schools to form part of the sample. Purposive sampling technique was then employed to select all the 20 principals of the sampled schools. Stratified sampling technique was also employed to divide teachers into four departments namely: mathematics and science, languages, humanities and technical. Simple random sampling was then employed to select 160 teachers to form part of the sample. Data from sampled principals was collected using an interview guide while data from sampled teachers was collected using a questionnaire. Data collected was analysed using both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Findings from the study revealed that implementation of performance appraisal in public secondary schools in Githunguri Sub-county of Kiambu County, Kenya are bedeviled by myriad of challenges which ultimately affect service delivery in the schools. The study recommended the need to educate teachers and all stakeholders on the importance of implementing the system. Care should be taken to avoid the scenario where the system is viewed as punishing teachers. The system should rather be seen to reward teachers who attain their set goals. Improvements should also be made incorporating teachers as well as all stakeholders’ views to further improve the tools. All the appraisers should be adequately trained on the use of the tools to ensure that they are not used as a formality or to settle differences.

References

[1] Agesa, P. (2005). Performance appraisal systems in schools and their impact on Performance of teachers.A case study of secondary schools in Teso District.Unpublished Masters Thesis Kenyatta University Library.
[2] Bana, B. (2009). Performance Management in the Tanzania Public Service, a paper Presented at the Conference on Governance Excellence: Managing Human Potential” held at Arusha International Conference Centre, United Republic of Tanzania, from 2nd – 4th March, 2009.
[3] Berman P. (2005). Appraisal systems for effective organizations. Prentice Hall: India.
[4] Cohen, M. (2005). Capacity Building in Public Sector: A Focused Framework for Analysis and Action’. International Review of Administrative Sciences 61(3): 407-22.
[5] GoK, (2005). Information Booklet on Performance Contracts in the Public Service. Nairobi: Government Printer.
[6] GoK, (2010).Office of the Prime Minister.Performance Contracting Department report on evaluation of the performance of public agencies for the financial year 2008/2009. Nairobi: Government Printer.
[7] GoK, (2005a).Office of the Prime Minister.Performance Contracting Department report on evaluation of the performance of public agencies for the financial year 2003/2004. Nairobi: Government Printer.
[8] Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination.Sage.
[9] Kobia, M. & Mohammed, N. (2003).The Kenyan Experience with Performance Contracting: Discussion Paper, AAPAM Annual Roundtable Conference, Arusha, Tanzania.
[10] Kobia, M. & Mohammed, N. (2006).The Kenyan Experience with Performance Contracting: Discussion Paper, 28th AAPAM Annual Roundtable Conference, Arusha, Tanzania.
[11] Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
[12] Maharaj, S. (2013).Administrator perceptions of Ontario’s teacher performance appraisal process.(Unpublished master dissertation).Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Ontario.
[13] Mbua, P. &Sarisar, J. (2013).Challenges in the implementation of performance contracting initiative in Kenya.Public Policy and Administration Research.Vol. 3, No. 2.
[14] Monyatsi, P., Steyn, T. and Kamper, G. (2006).Teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of teacher appraisal in Botswana.South African Journal of Education,Vol 26(3) 427–441.
[15] Mugenda O. & Mugenda, G. (1999).Research Methods-Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Acts Press: Nairobi.
[16] Nassiuma, D. (2000). Survey Sampling: Theory and Method. Nairobi: Nairobi University Press.
[17] Okoyo, O. (2010). Factors affecting implementation of work performance appraisal process for the teaching staff of Migori Teachers Training College. Unpublished Masters Thesis.Kenyatta University Library.
[18] Orodho, J. (2005). Elements of Education and Social Science Research Methods.Masola Publishers: Nairobi.
[19] Oteba T. (2016). Do not sign contracts, teachers told. Standard Digital.
[20] Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, R. G. (2013).Selecting samples. Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, 111.
[21] Schindler,D.W (2006). Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication
[22] Shah, B. & Ikramullah, M. et al. (2012). Purposes of Performance Appraisal System: A Perceptual Study of Civil Servants in District Dera Ismail Khan Pakistan.International Journal of Business and Management7(3): 142-151.
[23] Stronge, J. & Tucker, P. (2003). The Politics of Teacher Evaluation: A Case Study of New System Design and Implementation. Journal of PersonnelEvaluation in Education, 13 (4), 339-359.
[24] Triveldi, P. (2000). How to Evaluate Performance of Government Agency: A manual for Practitioners: World Bank: Washington D.C.
[25] Waweru, P. &Orodho, A. J. (2013).Management practices and students’ academic performance in national examinations in public secondary schools in Kiambu County.International Journal of Scientific Research, 5 (2), 472-479.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-04

How to Cite

K. Kamau, S., O. Bula, D. H., & O. Oringo, J. (2018). Challenges of Performance Appraisal Implementation and their Effects on Service Delivery in Public Secondary Schools in Githunguri Sub-county of Kiambu County, Kenya. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 49(1), 175–191. Retrieved from https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/4513

Issue

Section

Articles