Impacts of Blue Carbon Trading in Gazi Bay Mombasa Kenya

Beatrice Obegi

Abstract


It is beyond doubt that blue carbon has been overexploited and is now threatening the lives of the coastal communities. Most studies have proved that mangroves in Gazi Bay have been depleted over decades.  The study is assessing the concepts of carbon trading to restore the forest back. Impacts of blue carbon trading were assessed in Gazi Bay by obtaining primary data through a social survey and relevant questions to suit the study were administered. Secondary data was obtained from both Mikoko pamoja Project, women board walking and fish data was obtained from Gazi BMU. Data on revenue, fish, income, tourists, boardwalk cash and employment were collected and using promethee MCDA software they were analyzed for each year from 2013 to 2016. 2015 was ranked the highest followed by 2016, then 2014 and 2013 respectively. The rightmost column on the figures in the findings shows ranking according to Ph-:  and the leftmost column shows the same trend according to ph+. 2013 has so many weaknesses and was the least conserved year. Carbon trading impact to the livelihoods was assessed using the promethee model Valuation, the results showed that the carbon trading has improved the lives of the community by providing freshwater to the households, improved in health care and created employment improved in transport system. The promethee model used to rank the last four years of conserving the blue carbon and the impacts of carbon trading ranked the years from the best to the worst.  2016 received the lowest income while 2015 was the best. The results justified the implementation of conservation and restoration programs especially Mp and has encouraged carbon trading.

It is beyond doubt that blue carbon has been overexploited and is now threatening the lives of the coastal communities. Most studies have proved that mangroves in Gazi Bay have been depleted over decades.  The study is assessing the concepts of carbon trading to restore the forest back. Impacts of blue carbon trading were assessed in Gazi Bay by obtaining primary data through a social survey and relevant questions to suit the study were administered. Secondary data was obtained from both Mikoko pamoja Project, women board walking and fish data was obtained from Gazi BMU. Data on revenue, fish, income, tourists, boardwalk cash and employment were collected and using promethee MCDA software they were analyzed for each year from 2013 to 2016. 2015 was ranked the highest followed by 2016, then 2014 and 2013 respectively. The rightmost column on the figures in the findings shows ranking according to Ph-:  and the leftmost column shows the same trend according to ph+. 2013 has so many weaknesses and was the least conserved year. Carbon trading impact to the livelihoods was assessed using the promethee model Valuation, the results showed that the carbon trading has improved the lives of the community by providing freshwater to the households, improved in health care and created employment improved in transport system. The promethee model used to rank the last four years of conserving the blue carbon and the impacts of carbon trading ranked the years from the best to the worst.  2016 received the lowest income while 2015 was the best. The results justified the implementation of conservation and restoration programs especially Mp and has encouraged carbon trading


Keywords


Mangroves; Impacts; Carbon Trading; Promethhee Model; Livelihoods.

Full Text:

PDF

References


.s A.Huff and C.Tonui, (2017) Making 'Mangroves Together': Carbon, conservation and co-management in Gazi Bay, Kenya, STEPS Working Paper 95, Brighton: STEPS Centre

D. Along 2012, Carbon Sequestration in Mangrove forest Carbon Management 3(3) pp 313-322.

G. Chandria 2014, Distribution and Dynamics of Mangroves Forest of the world. Earth Resources Observation and Science( EROS) Centre

, C. Giri1*, E. Ochieng2, L. L. Tieszen3, Z. Zhu4, A. Singh5, T. Loveland3 J. Masek6 and N. Duke7 Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.)

Lang'at, J. K. St., Kairo, J. G2. and Karachi, MI. l Natural Resources Department, Egerton University 2Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute; proceedings of the 3rd kefri scientific conference 6-9 November 2006

J.G Kairo1, 2*, F. Dahdouh-Guebas2, J. Bosire1, 2 and N. Koedam2 Restoration and management of mangrove systems — a lesson for and from the East African region South African Journal of Botany 2001, 67: 383–389

N. N. Beeresnew 2007b, The world’s Mangroves 1980-2005; FAO forest paper 153 p 89

W. Steften 2015, The trajectory of the anthropogenic: The Great Acceleration, volume 2 issue 1 pp 81-98

P. B. Tomllinson 1994, The botany of mangroves

A. Wanjiro 2017, A report of Mikoko Pamoja Social Survey.

M. Huxham 2013, Mikoko Pamoja conservation for community benefit

Huxham 2010, Mangrove forest cover fading

H. Agevi, M. Wabwya, HM. Tsingalia Community Forest Associations and Community-

Based Organizations: Redesigning their Roles in Forest Management and Conservation in Kenya International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) Vololume 3 Issue 9,September 2014

J.B. Kauffman,. and D.C.Donato, 2012 Protocols for the measurement, monitoring and reporting of structure, biomass and carbon stocks in mangrove forests. Center for International Forestry Research Working Paper 86. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia

F. Dahduh-Guebas & B. Satyanarayana Proceedings of the International Conference: Meeting on Mangrove ecology, functioning and Management (MMM3) 2-6 July 2012, Galle, Sri Lanka


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments


 
 
  
 

 

  


About ASRJETS | Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions | Contact Us | DisclaimerFAQs 

ASRJETS is published by (GSSRR).