An Empirical Study on Political Empowerment of Migrant Women of Sri Lanka in the Context of Globalization

Ravindra Chandrasiri Palliyaguruge, Upali Pannilage

Abstract


This article has analyzed Friedrich Engels’s theory on the origin of the Family, Private Property and the State and it’s relevant to unexpressed conflicts within the sphere of family and political empowerment of migrant women in the public domain. According to Engels (1884), class conflicts can be seen between private property owned husband and proletariat wife within the sphere of family. This study has investigated levels of women’s involvement in decision making process of the family, after achieving income generating ability by migration in the context of globalization.  The methodology of the study is based on post-positivism approach and has adopted the qualitative research design. This study applied semi-structured interview method to collect primary data. The sample of the study is consisted of 60 households of women migrant workers, selected purposively from Karandeniya Divisional Secretariat, in Galle District, Sri Lanka. Data analysis has been done under three broader thematic areas namely (a) individual realm, (b) nuclear family realm, and (c) extended family realm. The study concluded with that the economic factor is not acquiring same value in every society. Specially, when Friedrich Engels’s theory on the origin of the family, private property and the state applies in to the Asian countries such as Sri Lanka, even in the context of globalization, number of other factors such as patriarchal form of governance, cultural hegemony, institutionalized sexual violence within the sphere of family, domestic violence as a barrier,  elderliness vs. youngest syndrome or the concept of being the ‘’youngest’ ’can be seen as crucial factors of women economic and political empowerment.


Keywords


Classical Marxism; Fredric Engels; Globalization; Women Migration; Women Empowerment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


. L. Sklair. “The Transnational Capitalist Class and the Discourse of Globalization”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol:14. Issue: 1. pp 67-85, 2000.

. A. A. Boron. “Hegemony and Imperialism in the International System”. Buenos Aires: Latin American Council of Social Sciences (CLACSO). Available at: http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/se/20100613065759/8Boron.pdf,2004.[November.12, 2016].

. L. Sklair. Globalization. Capitalism and its Alterative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 35-58.

. J.E. Stiglitz. Making Globalization Work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company,2006.

. M. Hardt. and A. Negri. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.2000.

. International Labour Organization. International Labour Migration: A Rights-based Approach. Geneva: International Labour Office.2010.

. M. Khor. Globalization, liberalization, protectionism: impacts on poor rural producers in developing countries. Third World Network.2006.

. B. Kumaravadivelu. Dangerous Liaison: Globalization, Empire and TESOL’ in Re- Locating TESOL in an Age of Empire. Julian Edge, Ed. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.2006.pp 1-27.

. E.M. Wood. Empire of Capital. London: Verso. 2003.

. E.M. Wood. The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View. London: Monthly Review Press.2002.

. L. Sklair. and P. T. Robbins. Global capitalism and major corporations from the third world. Third World Quarterly, Vol 23, No 1, pp 81–100, 2002.

. W.I. Robinson. The Pitfalls of Realist Analysis of Global Capitalism: A Critique of Ellen Meiksins Wood’s Empire of Capital”. Historical Materialism, 15. pp.71–93.2007.

. G. Arrighi. “Lineages of Empire”. Historical Materialism, Volume 10:3, pp. 3–16.2002.

. F. Engels. Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, Internet: www.marxists.org. 1884 [May.25, 2016).

. J. Uyangoda. Writing Research Proposals in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Colombo: Social Scientists’ Association.2012.

. J. W. Creswell. RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: SAGE Publications.2003.

. E. Fossey., C. Harvey., F. McDermott. and L. Davidson. “Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 36. pp 36:717–732.2002.

. R. Edwards. and J. Holland. What is Qualitative Interviewing? London: Bloomsbury.2013.

. J. Miller. and B. Glassner. “The “Inside” and the “Outside”: Finding Realities in Interviews”. In Qualitative Research, D. Silverman, Eds. New Delhi: Sage.2011.

. G. Gobo. “Ethnography” in Qualitative Research, D. Silverman. Eds. New Delhi: Sage.2011.

. M. Hudson. Super Imperialism the Economic Strategy of American Empire. London: Pluto Press.2003.

. D. Harvey. The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.2003.

. C. Fuchs. “Critical Globalization Studies: An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of the New Imperialism”. Science & Society, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp, 215–247.2010.

. U. Pannilage. Globalization and Construction of Local Culture in Rural Sri Lanka. Sociology Study. Vol. 6, No. 7, pp 448‐461. June 2016. DOI: 10.17265/2159‐5526/2016.07.003.

. U. Pannilage. Effect of Transnational Interventions of Alienation and Bureaucratization on Village Life. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology. Vol 4(6), pp.26-38. June 2017.

. M. Buvinić. and G. Rao. Geeta. “Female-Headed Households and Female-Maintained Families: Are They Worth Targeting to Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries?”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 259-280.1997.

. Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary. Sixth edition, Oxford University Press: Oxford. 2000.

. M.A. Zimmerman., B. A. Israel., A. Schulz., and, B. Checkoway. “Further Explorations in Empowerment Theory: An Empirical Analysis of Psychological Empowerment”. American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1992.

. D. Douglas Perkins., A. Marc Zimmerman. “Empowerment theory, research, and application”. American Journal of Community Psychology, pp. 569 – 679.1995.

. U. Pannilage. Excluding the Worthy: Need of participation of Marginalised in the decision making process. Humanities and Social Sciences Review. University of Ruhuna , 2(2) pp 86-98, 2015.

. U. Pannilage. A Socio-economic Analysis on the Gender Wage Gap among Agricultural Laborers in Rural Sri Lanka. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences •Vol 30 (1). pp 338-350. April 2017.

. N. Kabeer, “Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment” in Sida studies No 03, Sisask, A. (ed.). Stockholm: Sida. 2001.

. U. Pannilage. Prejudice-Based Discrimination Encountered by Women War Widows in the Post-War Society of Sri Lanka. In “Avenues”: Papers on Peace, Reconciliation and Development Challenges. University of Ruhuna. pp 40-56. 2017.

. U. Pannilage, C.P.M. Gunawardane, Military War Widows in Post-war Sri Lanka. Journal of Conflict, Peace and Development Studies (JOCPDS), 1 (2). pp 1-13. December 2016.

. A. Rai. “Landless Despite Laws: Land Rights of Women in Post-conflict Nepal and Sri Lanka”. Journal of Social Review, Volume 3:1, pp. 16-23. 2014.

. Department of Census & Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, Colombo: Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs. 2012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 
  
 

 

  


About ASRJETS | Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions | Contact Us | DisclaimerFAQs 

ASRJETS is published by (GSSRR).