Methodological Approaches to Emergency Recovery of Information Systems in Multi?Contour Environments

Authors

  • Alexander Andreyev

Keywords:

multi‑contour environments, emergency recovery, Disaster Recovery, Zero Trust, Infrastructure as Code, microservices, DMZ, RTO, RPO, backup 3‑2‑1‑1+, DraaS

Abstract

The article examines a methodological approach to the emergency recovery of information systems in multi?contour environments. The increasing complexity of digital platforms underscores the relevance of this study, the need to segment infrastructures into autonomous technological contours, and the requirement to ensure high recovery speed while maintaining the logical and physical isolation of trust zones. Downtime losses and more burdensome regulations (NIS2, DORA, ISO 22301, IEC 62443) are new pressures on the art of Disaster Recovery. The paper aims to develop and justify methodological principles and algorithms for synchronizing disaster recovery plans across different contexts, while keeping them isolated in terms of target RTO/RPO metrics. Therefore, it includes a review of industry reports, regulatory documents, and practical guides that integrate Business Impact Analysis with threat-scenario modeling, following the NIST SP 800-30 methodology. It lives in two dimensions of novelty: the comprehensive integration of four architectural pillars as a unified framework for multi-contour environments and multi-level failover orchestration, together with contour-aware replication that enables seamless switching. Results are keyed to the facts that this method enables the attainment of the desired RTO and RPO with complete security, lowers the risk of cascading failure, and maintains all paths within the bounds of regulatory requirements. Inside each contour, there is synchronous replication, while between contours, there is asynchronous, encrypted replication, combined with the use of the 3-2-1-1+ backup approach. The involvement of DRaaS providers guarantees business-process continuity, preserving the logical isolation of segments. This article will find its readership among IT infrastructure managers and specialists, cybersecurity engineers, Disaster Recovery Solution architects, and information security auditors.

Author Biography

  • Alexander Andreyev

    Solution Engineer Independent IT Contractor,Seattle, USA

References

[1] ABB survey reveals unplanned downtime costs $125,000 per hour, ABB, Oct. 11, 2023. https://new.abb.com/news/detail/107660/abb-survey-reveals-unplanned-downtime-costs-125000-per-hour (accessed Jun. 22, 2025).

[2] OT Cybersecurity Risk Elevates within Executive Leadership Ranks, Fortinet, 2025. https://www.fortinet.com/corporate/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/2025/fortinet-report-ot-cybersecurity-risk-elevates-within-executive-leadership-ranks (accessed Jun. 23, 2025).

[3] A. Ribeiro, SANS Institute 2024 survey reveals progress and gaps in ICS/OT cybersecurity for critical infrastructure, Industrial Cyber, Oct. 08, 2024. https://industrialcyber.co/threats-attacks/sans-institute-2024-survey-reveals-progress-and-gaps-in-ics-ot-cybersecurity-for-critical-infrastructure/ (accessed Jun. 24, 2025).

[4] E. Hancock, Compliance is evolving — Is your resilience ready?, TechRadar, 2025. https://www.techradar.com/pro/compliance-is-evolving-is-your-resilience-ready (accessed Jun. 26, 2025).

[5] L. Flå, M. Lundteigen, F. Gratte, and M. Gilje, Implementation of Zones and Conduits in Industrial Control and Automation Systems, Jaatun, 2024. Accessed: Jun. 27, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jaatun.no/papers/2024/Zones-and-Conduits.pdf

[6] SANS 2024 ICS/OT Cybersecurity Survey Reveals Significant Progress While Highlighting That Major Gaps Remain in Securing Critical Infrastructure, SANS Institute, 2024. https://www.sans.org/press/announcements/2024-ics-ot-cybersecurity-survey-reveals-significant-progress-while-highlighting-that-major-gaps-remain-in-securing-critical-infrastructure (accessed Jun. 28, 2025).

[7] RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective), Commvault, Jun. 05, 2024. https://www.commvault.com/glossary-library/rto-rpo (accessed Jun. 30, 2025).

[8] NIST, Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments, NIST, Sep. 2012. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/legacy/sp/nistspecialpublication800-30r1.pdf

[9] CISA Analysis: Fiscal Year 2023, Risk and Vulnerability Assessments, CISA. https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/FY23_RVA_Analysis_508.pdf (accessed Jul. 02, 2025).

[10] HashiCorp, HashiCorp State of Cloud Strategy Survey, HashiCorp, 2024. https://www.hashicorp.com/en/state-of-the-cloud (accessed Jul. 03, 2025).

[11] IBM, Cost of a Data Breach Report, IBM, 2024. Accessed: Jul. 05, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://wp.table.media/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/30132828/Cost-of-a-Data-Breach-Report-2024.pdf

[12] IBM, IBM Report: Consumers Pay the Price as Data Breach Costs Reach All-Time High, IBM, Jul. 27, 2022. https://newsroom.ibm.com/2022-07-27-IBM-Report-Consumers-Pay-the-Price-as-Data-Breach-Costs-Reach-All-Time-High (accessed Jul. 07, 2025).

[13] Veeam, 2023 Data Protection Trends, Veeam, 2023. https://www.veeam.com/infographics/data-protection-trends-report-infographic-global-2023_wp.pdf (accessed Jul. 09, 2025).

[14] Splunk, Splunk Report Shows Downtime Costs Global 2000 Companies $400B Annually, Splunk, 2024. https://www.splunk.com/en_us/newsroom/press-releases/2024/conf24-splunk-report-shows-downtime-costs-global-2000-companies-400-billion-annually.html (accessed Jul. 10, 2025).

[15] AWS multi-Region fundamentals AWS Prescriptive Guidance, Amazon, 2025. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/pdfs/prescriptive-guidance/latest/aws-multi-region-fundamentals/aws-multi-region-fundamentals.pdf (accessed Jul. 12, 2025).

[16] State of Data Resilience in the Enterprise, Arserve, 2024. Accessed: Jul. 14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://goto.arcserve.com/rs/431-WBH-895/images/Executive-Report-State-of-Data-Resilience-Enterprise.pdf?version=0

[17] DRaaS guide: Benefits, challenges, providers and market trends, Tech Target, 2020. https://www.techtarget.com/searchdisasterrecovery/DRaaS-guide-Benefits-challenges-providers-and-market-trends (accessed Jul. 16, 2025).

[18] Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) Market, Markets and Markets, 2023. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/report-search-page.asp?rpt=disaster-recovery-as-a-service-draas-market (accessed Jul. 19, 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Alexander Andreyev. (2025). Methodological Approaches to Emergency Recovery of Information Systems in Multi?Contour Environments. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 103(1), 125-136. https://asrjetsjournal.org/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/12003