Investigation by Cone Penetration Tests of Piled Foundations in Frozen Soil Maintained by Thermosyphons

Authors

  • Nikolay Volkov Ph.D., P.Eng., Lead Engineer, Fugro, 29 Vernadsky ave., Moscow, 119331, Russia
  • Ivan Sokolov Geotechnical Engineer, Fugro, 29 Vernadsky ave., Moscow, 119331, Russia
  • Richard Jewell Ph.D., Principal Geotechnical Consultant, Fugro, Av. de Broqueville 12, 1150 Brussels, Belgium

Keywords:

Cone Penetration Testing, Frozen Soil Foundation Diagnostics, Frozen Soil Temperature, Permafrost Soils, Pile Bearing Capacity, Thermosyphon.

Abstract

Infrastructure built on permafrost may experience differential settlement and deformation due to permafrost degradation caused by many factors such as climate change, man-made impact, redistribution of snow cover, alteration of subsurface water flow, etc. Even a small change in the temperature of frozen soil can significantly alter (increase or decrease) the mechanical properties of the soil and hence the bearing capacity of piles. Modern Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) provides direct measurement of soil resistance and temperature in permafrost, thereby permitting the validation of pile capacity in permafrost conditions. An example application of CPT tests to diagnose the condition of piled foundations at the Salekhard College, Western Siberia, Russia, is described. The frozen soil is maintained by thermosyphons that are exposed in the crawl space below the building.  CPT tests were completed from within the crawl space to measure cone resistance qc [MPa], sleeve friction fs [kPa] and temperature T [°C] at several locations close to the thermosyphons and piles.  The data was obtained both within the zone of influence of the thermosyphons and at distance from the thermosyphons and piles, to provide “baseline” measurements. Based on this data; 1) the cooling effect of the thermosyphons was directly measured (soil temperature decrease), 2) the pile bearing capacity could be estimated and 3) pile capacity could be compared at different locations beneath the building.  In future projects it would be useful for reference during subsequent verification of foundation conditions to obtain data on the baseline soil properties and temperature conditions before installation of the piles and thermosyphons. 

References

[1]. T. Lunne, P.K. Robertson and J.J. Powell. Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. London and New York: Spon Press, 2004, 312 p.
[2]. I.B. Ryzhkov and O.N. Isaev. Cone Penetration Testing of Soils in Geotechnics. Stockholm, Sweden: ASV Construction, 2016, 408 p.
[3]. B. Ladanyi. “Use of static penetration test in frozen soils.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, ? 13 (2), pp. 95-110, 1976.
[4]. S.E. Blouin, E.J. Chamberlain, P.V. Sellmann, D.E. Garfield. “Penetration Tests in Subsea Permafrost, Prudhoe Bay, Alaska”. CRREL Report 79-7, 1979, 49 p.
[5]. R. Fortier and W. Yu, “Penetration Rate-Controlled Electrical Resistivity and Temperature Piezocone Penetration Tests in Warm Ice-Rich Permafrost in Northern Quebec (Canada)” in Proc. Cold Regions Engineering 2012: Sustainable Infrastructure Development in a Changing Cold Environment, ASCE, 2012, pp. 757-767.
[6]. I.S. Sokolov, N.G. Volkov and V.S. Isaev. “Cone Penetration Testing for Railways on Permafrost,” in Proc. XI International Conference on Permafrost, 2016, pp. 1144-1145.
[7]. SNiP 2.02.04-88 “Bases and Foundations on the Permafrost Soils” (in Russian)
[8]. SP 25.13330.2012 “Bases and Foundations on Permafrost Soils”. Appendix ?. Moscow: Minregion Rossii, 2011, pp. 94-97 (in Russian)
[9]. STO 36554501-049-2016 “CPT Application for Soil Foundation Control on Permafrost”. Moscow: AO NIC “Stroitelstvo”, 2016, 53 p. (in Russian)
[10]. GOST 19912-2012 “Soils. Methods of cone penetration testing and dynamic soundings”. EASC: MNTKS, 2012, 33 p. (in Russian)

Downloads

Published

2017-04-27

How to Cite

Volkov, N., Sokolov, I., & Jewell, R. (2017). Investigation by Cone Penetration Tests of Piled Foundations in Frozen Soil Maintained by Thermosyphons. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 31(1), 40–58. Retrieved from https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/2909

Issue

Section

Articles