Verification of Design Solutions for Port Hydraulic Structures with the Use of Physical and Mathematical (Numerical) Simulation to Ensure Safety of Marine Terminals and Seaports

Authors

  • Oleg Mamaev Zastavskaya st. 46/1 – 347, Saint Petersburg, 196006, Russia

Keywords:

port hydraulic structure, terminal, port, water area, design, natural factors, physical simulation, mathematical (numerical) simulation

Abstract

The article considers the possibility of verification of design solutions for port hydraulic structures with the help of physical and mathematical (numerical) types of simulation to ensure the safety of marine terminals and seaports, including under the impact of various natural phenomena. The features of these types of simulation are discussed, a brief description of the range of problems to be solved is given.

Author Biography

Oleg Mamaev, Zastavskaya st. 46/1 – 347, Saint Petersburg, 196006, Russia

  • PrePhD degree in the Management and Civil Engineering.
  • 15+ years of a work experience in International Oil and Gas Projects, implemented jointly with companies from the USA and UK (Exxon, Shell, SGSI, KBR): main pipeline systems, LNG plants and marine terminals.
  • Member of the APEC Engineer Register – Association of professional engineers of countries the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), including the USA, as part of The International Engineering Alliance (IEA).
  • Member of the Russian National Register of Experts in Surveying and Designing and the Russian National Register of Experts in Construction.

References

. “International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code)”. RD 31.15.01-89, Russia, May. 03, 1989.

. R.A. Vinogradov, O.M. Andreev. (2020, May). “Accounting for hydrometeorological conditions when selecting the layout of cargo terminals and ports in the Russian Arctic” Neftegaz.RU Vol.11, 2017. Available: https://magazine.neftegaz.ru/articles/arktika/548795-uchet-gidrometeorologicheskikh-usloviy-pri-vybore-komponovki-gruzovykh-terminalov-i-portov-v-rossiys/ [Feb.18, 2025].

. “General Board of State Expert Review described the most common mistakes in the design of port hydraulic structure” Hydrotechnics Vol.2, 2024. Available: https://hydroteh.ru/news/v_glavgosekspertize_rasskazali_o_naibolee_chastnyh_oshibkah_pri_proektirovanii_portovyh_gts_4753/?ysclid=lwt2lllltz687438644 [Feb.18, 2025].

. “Hazard and risk of emergencies at hydraulic structures” Geoportal of the Institute of computer simulation of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Internet: https://gis.krasn.ru/blog/content/opasnost-i-risk-chs-na-gidrotekhnicheskikh-sooruzheniyakh [Feb.18, 2025].

. “Hydraulic structures. The main provisions”. SP 58.13330.2019, Russia, Jun. 17, 2020.

. “Shallow-Water Towing Tank” Krylov State Research Centre Internet: https://krylov-centre.ru/en/experimental/basin-river/ [Feb.18, 2025].

. “Physical simulation of Wave Effects on Port Hydraulic Structures. Requirements for model generation, experimentation and results processing”. GOST R 70023-2022, Russia, Jan. 01, 2022.

. I.G. Kantarzhi, K.P. Mordvintsev. “Numerical and physical simulation of seaport hydraulic structures” Science and Security, vol. 15, pp. 2-15, Feb. 2015.

. API RP 2N Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing, and Constructing Structures and Pipelines for Arctic Conditions. 2nd edition. American Petroleum Institute (API), 1995.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-15

How to Cite

Mamaev, O. (2025). Verification of Design Solutions for Port Hydraulic Structures with the Use of Physical and Mathematical (Numerical) Simulation to Ensure Safety of Marine Terminals and Seaports. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 101(1), 253–259. Retrieved from https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/11476

Issue

Section

Articles