A Woman Among Men the Language of Madness and Power on TV – The Case of Carrie Mathison in Homeland

Claudia Monacelli


This study analyzes the language used in the TV series Homeland that represents a predominantly male working environment, the world of intelligence, when a key female empowered protagonist, Carrie Mathison, becomes disempowered due to her mental illness, bipolarity. After conducting an initial pilot study consisting of one episode from each of the seven seasons, we decided to focus on the ideolect and slang of intelligence circles, deixis and pronominal reference, irony, variations in register, patterns of repetition and doublespeak for this purpose. This paper concludes with a discussion of how each of these analytical tools work toward either strengthening Carrie Mathison’s power or indicating her disempowerment in relation to her social context and working environment.


Power; Madness; Women Empowerment; Deixis; Pronominal Reference; TV Series.

Full Text:



L. Goffe. “The Homeland Phenomenon.” Middle East Magazine 440: 54, 2013.

M. Foucault. “Truth and Power.” Orientalism: A Reader, A.L. Macfie Ed. New York: New York University Press, 42, 2001.

D. O’Hern. “An Analysis of Bipolar Disorder Stereotypes in 21st Century Television Programming.” Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, vol. 8, no. 2, 67-76, 2017.

A. Swann, M. Lijffijt, S. Lane, K. Kjome, J.Steinberg, F. Moeller. “Criminal conviction, impulsivity, and course of illness in bipolar disorder.” Bipolar Disorders: An International Journal of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, 13(2), 173-181, 2011.

J. Busfield. Men, Women and Madness. New York: NYU Press, 1996.

M. Hoey and G. Thompson Eds. Patterns of Text: In honour of Michael Hoey. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2001.

C. Monacelli. “A Tightrope with a Net.” Meta 49(4): 891-909, 2004.

C. Monacelli. 2018 “Race, Gender and Social Class in TV series Scandal: Patterns of repetition, pronominal reference and refraction.” IJNRHSS - International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, Vol. 5, Issue 4, 19-29, 2018.

A. Gramsci. Prison notebooks. Vol. 2. J. Buttigieg Trans. and Ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

D. Boothman. “The Sources for Gramsci's Concept of Hegemony.” Rethinking Marxism, vol. 20, no. 2, 201–215, 2008.

F. Lo Piparo. Lingua, intellettuali, egemonia in Gramsci. Roma: Laterza, 1979.

N. A. García. Emotions in Contemporary TV Series. New York: Springer, 2016.

T. Gitlin. “The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment.” Social Problems, vol. 26, no. 3. Berkeley: University of California Press, 251-266, 1979.

S. Harper. Madness, Power and the Media: Class, Gender and Race in Popular Representations of Mental Distress. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2009.

J. Castonguay. (2015) “Fictions of Terror: Complexity, Complicity and Insecurity in Homeland.” Cinema Journal, D. Negra and L. Lagerwey, Eds. vol. 54 no. 4: 139-144.

M. Rubin. Thrillers. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999.

S. Faludi. La pesadilla terrorista: miedo y fantasia en Estados Unidos después del 11/S. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2009.

T. Steiner. (2012). Dealing with a Nation’s Trauma: Allegories on 9/11 in Contemporary Serial US Television Drama Narratives and the Case of Homeland. London: Birbeck College, University of London, 2012.

A. Bidu-Vrănceanu. “Lexicul specializat în mişcare de la dictionare la texte.” Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti. 2, 2007.

P. Lerat. Les langues spécialisées, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1995.

M. T. Cabré. 1998. “La terminologie: théorie, méthode et application.” Traduit du Catalan, M. C. Cormier and John Humbley Trans. Ottawa: Les Presses de l'Université d'Ottawa, 1998.

G. Berruto. Sociolinguistica dell’Italiano Contemporaneo. Roma: Carocci, 1987.

P. Chilton and C. Schäffner. “Discourse and Politics.” Discourse as Social Interaction, T. A. Van Dijk Ed. London: Sage, 206-230, 1997.

N. Fairclough. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge, 2003.

T. A. Van Dijk. “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. R. Wodak and M. Meyer Eds. London: Sage, 95-120, 2001.

P. Chilton. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge, 2004.

M. J. Malone. (1997) Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Malden, MA/Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.

H. P. Grice. Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics. New York, Academy Press, 1975.

S. Kumon-Nakamura, S. Glucksberg and M: Brown “How About Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.” Gibbs, R. W. and Colston, H. L. Eds. Irony in Language and Thought. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57-96, 2007.

J. Schwoebel, S. Dews, E. Winner and K. Srinivas. “Obligatory Processing of Literal Meaning of Ironic Utterances: Further Evidence.” Gibbs, R. W. and Colston, H. L. Eds. Irony in Language and Thought. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 253-268, 2007.

D. Biber. “Register and Discourse Analysis. ”J. P. Gee and M. Handford Eds. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, New York/Oxon: Routledge, 191-208, 2012.

M. Hoey. Patterns of Lexis in Texts. Oxford: OUP, 1991.

M. Hoey. Lexical Priming: A new theory of words and language. London/New York: Routledge, 2005.

M. Hoey, M. “Lexical priming and literary creativity.” M. Hoey, Mahlberg, Stubbs and W. Teubert Eds. Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and analysis. London/New York: Contiuum, 7-29, 2007.

W. Lutz. Doublespeak. New York: Harper, 1989.


  • There are currently no refbacks.




About ASRJETS | Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions | Contact Us | DisclaimerFAQs 

ASRJETS is published by (GSSRR).