Methods of Reasoning in Scientific Discovery
Keywords:
General Statement, Statistical generalization, Inductive Generalization, Induction, Deduction and Abduction.Abstract
In this paper, we briefly discuss the forms of arguments and the methods of reasoning in scientific experiments, namely, inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. We find that generalization is in human nature, and it is only a conception without any perception. The short comings of the applications of deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are analyzed using examples. It is observed that deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning methods are invalid in scientific reasoning. We discuss the vulnerability of the foundation of science that is based on the methods of inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning. We find that it is by abductive reasoning that theories are constructed to explain empirical observations. Abductive reasoning is only the reasoning method that can be applied for the observations in the empirical world. Finally, we conclude that the best and the most effective method of reasoning is the abductive reasoning for scientific experiments.
References
[2] Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. Charles Sanders Peirce [updated 2017 May 20; cited 2017 May 23]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce
[3] G. Nandasena, L. N. K. de Silva, K. K. W. A. S. and Kumara, “Basic Rules of Aristotelian logic and Induction”. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS) (2017) Vol 29, No 1, pp 263-270.
[4] G. S. Stephen. Logic and Mathematics. [Lecture notes on internet]. Pennsylvania: State University; Department of mathematics; 2000 [2015 Dec 26]. Available from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/t20/papers/philmath.pdf.
[5] G. Hardegree. Symbolic Logic, A First Course [Lecture notes on internet]. McGraw-Hill College; 1999 [cited 2015 Dec 26]. Available from: http://courses.umass.edu/phil110-gmh/MAIN/IHome-5.htm
[6] N. John, R. Dennis and V. Achille. Shaum's Outline of Theory and Problems of Logic. 2nd ed. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited; 2004.
[7] G. Nandasena, L. N. K. de Silva, K. K. W. A. S. and Kumara, “n-Fold m-Valued Logic”. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS) (2017) Vol 30, No 1, pp 372-384.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.