Measuring the e-Government Maturity in Indonesia using the Ranking of e-Government of Indonesia (PeGI)
Keywords:
e-Government ranking, e-Government, Indonesian Government, PeGI, e-Government success.Abstract
In rapid development of Information Communication and Technology (ICT), citizens need fast and easy-to-access regarding e-Government services. To fulfil the requirements, Indonesian Government has been developed and implemented e-Government services in both local and central government. However, to measure the e-Government success, there is a model to measure the ranking of e-Government in Indonesia named PeGI. The measurement is applied to ministry, non-ministry government, and local government institution. This paper aims to measure e-Government development and implementation in a Ministry institution in Indonesia. The measurement model divided e-Government into 4 dimensions; policy, institutional, infrastructure, application, and planning. The result of the measurement indicated that the Ministry has 3.37 out of 4 and it belongs to good rating. Further in this paper, we also give recommendations to improve the e-Government development and implementation in the Ministry in order to deliver better services to citizen and other partners.
References
[2] M. Kurfal, A. Arifolu, G. Tokdemir, and Y. Pain, “Adoption of e-government services in Turkey,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 66, pp. 168–178, 2017.
[3] R. Kumar, A. Sachan, and A. Mukherjee, “Qualitative approach to determine user experience of e-government services,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 71, pp. 299–306, 2017.
[4] K. A. Shahkooh, F. Saghafi, and A. Abdollahi, “A proposed model for e-government maturity,” 3rd Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. From Theory to Appl. ICTTA, no. May, 2008.
[5] Z. Li and F. Yang, “The E-government Information Model Based on GPR,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 91, pp. 193–200, 2016.
[6] D. Witarsyah, T. Sjafrizal, M. F. M. Fudzee, and M. A. Salamat, “The critical factors affecting E-Government adoption in Indonesia: A conceptual framework,” Eur. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 160–167, 2017.
[7] F. Alusi and D. Sensuse, “Penyusunan Strategi E-Government Berbasis Kerangka Kerja Pemeringkatan E-Government Indonesia (PeGi) Di Lembaga Penerbangan dan Antariksa Nasional,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2014.
[8] E. A. Sosiawan, “Pengembangan E-Government di Indonesia,” Inst. Public Policy Res., 2010.
[9] Direktorat e-Government, “Tentang PeGI | Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI).” [Online]. Available: http://pegi.layanan.go.id/tentang-pegi/. [Accessed: 03-Nov-2016].
[10] S. Krishnan, T. S. H. Teo, and V. K. G. Lim, “Examining the relationships among e-government maturity, corruption, economic prosperity and environmental degradation: A cross-country analysis,” Inf. Manag., vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 638–649, 2013.
[11] F. Antony, R. Gustriansyah, and R. R. Putra, “Penilaian Indek e-Government pada Dinkes Kota Palembang,” J. Inform. Glob., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–37, 2015.
[12] A. Fitriansyah, H. Budiarto, and J. Santoso, “Metode Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI) Untuk Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi,” Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. Indones. 2013, pp. 10–20, 2013.
[13] D. Kang, W. Jang, and Y. Park, “Evaluation of e-commerce websites using fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS based on E-S-QUAL,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 42, pp. 53–65, 2016.
[14] Direktorat e-Government, “Dimensi Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia | Pemeringkatan e-Government Indonesia (PeGI).” [Online]. Available: http://pegi.layanan.go.id/tentang-pegi/dimensi-pemeringkatan-e-government-indonesia/. [Accessed: 03-Nov-2016].
[15] G. Goldkuhl, “E-government design research: Towards the policy-ingrained IT artifact,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 444–452, 2016.
[16] A. Prahono and Elidjen, “Evaluating the Role e-Government on Public Administration Reform: Case of Official City Government Websites in Indonesia,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 59, no. Iccsci, pp. 27–33, 2015.
[17] A. Pons, “E-Government for Arab Countries,” J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag., vol. 7, no. March, pp. 30–46, 2004.
[18] J. M. Ruano de la Fuente, “E-Government strategies in Spanish local governments,” Local Gov. Stud., vol. 40, no. February, pp. 600–620, 2014.
[19] A. Savoldelli, C. Codagnone, and G. Misuraca, “Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 31, no. SUPPL.1, pp. S63–S71, 2014.
[20] M. Deakin, J. Caldow, T. Nam, C. Of, N. Of, F. O. F. The, I. Of, D. Gatekeepers, I. P. Initiatives, F. E. Author, A. H. Source, U. T. C. R. Linked, N. O’shaughnessy, J. Caldow, J. Guha, B. Chakrabarti, O. Al-Hujran, M. M. Al-Debei, A. Chatfield, and M. Migdadi, “Mobile e-Gov: No Turning Back to the Swamp,” J. Polit. Mark., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–157, 2014.
[21] H. Choi, M. J. Park, J. J. Rho, and H. Zo, “Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design???reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system,” Telecomm. Policy, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 644–660, 2014.
[22] S. H. Holden and L. I. Millett, “Authentication, Privacy, and the Federal E-Government,” Inf. Soc., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 367–377, 2005.
[23] M. Zammani and R. Razali, “An empirical study of information security management success factors,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 904–913, 2016.
[24] S. Borins, “A Holistic View of Public Sector Information Technology,” New Econ., vol. 1, no. January 2015, pp. 37–41, 2005.
[25] S. Tümen, “Informality as a stepping stone?: A search-theoretical assessment of informal sector and government policy,” Cent. Bank Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 109–117, 2016.
[26] M. H. Santosa, M. S. Maarif, and T. Andati, “System Analysis in Developing an Effective Government Internal Audit System,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–160, 2016.
[27] Veronice, “Analysis level of utilization information and communication technology with the competency level of extension workers,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 226–229, 2015.
[28] B. Warf, “Asian geographies of e-government,” Eurasian Geogr. Econ., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 94–110, 2014.
[29] U. Löfstedt, “E-Government services in local governments – a study of development,” J. Organ. Transform. Soc. Chang., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 157–176, 2007.
[30] M. H. Shaikh and N. A. Ansari, “Examining a Norwegian client’s response over information security and privacy policy,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 165–169, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.