A Systematic Change Management Capability Maturity Assessment Framework for Contracting Organizations
Keywords:
Change Management, Capability Assessment Framework, Capability, Maturity Level, Fuzzy, Contracting Organization.Abstract
The complexity of construction projects coupled with the fragmentation of design and construction process made it to be affected by varied factors that trigger project changes which incorporate risks of cost and time overruns, conflict, and quality defects. Hence the need for a pragmatic approach that will provide systematic assessment of the management capability maturity in order to mitigate the deleterious effects of project changes. This paper therefore presents a change management capability maturity assessment framework for contracting organizations. The paper describes the development process of a fuzzy synthetic evaluation based framework, including its contents and validation. The framework has five capability areas of; leadership; application; competencies; standardization; and socialization. These attributes are measured against five levels namely: Absent/adhoc; isolated project; multiple projects; organizational standard; and organizational competency. The research adopted survey approach that uses questionnaire survey as data collection mechanism. Adopting normalization method and fuzzy synthetic evaluation method as quantitative data analysis technique, it is found that the weakest capability area is ‘socialization’; followed by ‘application’ of standardized change management process. It is also found that the overall change management capability maturity level (CMCML) was ‘moderate’ (3.29). Furthermore, the research finding shows that the proposed framework is users’ friendly, comprehensive and easily comprehensible. Finally, the research concluded that the proposed framework is suitable for contracting organizations to individually assess their CMCML and find ways for continuous improvement based on lessons learned.
References
[2] M. Sun, C. Vidalakis, T. Oza. “A change management maturity model for construction projects”. In: Dainty, A. (Ed) Proceedings 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, of Association of researchers in construction management, 2009, pp. 803-812.
[3] I. A. Motawa, C. J. Anumba, S. Lee, F. Pena-Mora. “An integrated system for change management in construction”. Automation in construction. Vol.16, pp. 368-377, 2007.
[4] C. W. Ibbs, C. K. Wong, Y. H. Kwak. “Project Change Management System”. Journal of Management in Engineering. ASCE, Vol.17(3), pp. 159 –165, 2001.
[5] I. A. Motawa, C. J. Anumba, A. El-Hamalawi, P. W. H. Chung, M. Yeoh. “Modelling change processes within construction project”. Proceedings of the second International conference on structural and construction engineering (ISEC-02). 2003, PP. 2185-2190.
[6] Q. Hao, W. Shen, J. Neelamkavil, R. Thomas, (2008). Change management in construction projects. Proceedings of International conference on information technology in construction. 2008.
[7] M. Sun, M. Sexton, G. Aouad, A. Fleming, S. Senaratne, C. Anumba. “Managing Changes in Construction Projects”. EPSRC Industrial Report, pp. 185-190, 2004.
[8] S. Lee, F. Pena-Mora, M. Park. “Quality and Change Management Model for Large Scale Concurrent Design and Construction Projects”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.131 (8), pp. 890-902, 2005.
[9] M. Sarshar, R. Haigh, M. Finnemore, G. Aouad, P. Barret, D. Baldry et al. “A business process diagnostic tool for construction projects”. Engineering construction and Architectural management journal. Vol. 3(3), pp. 241 – 250, 2000.
[10] Prosci, Inc. (2007). “Change management maturity model Audi preparation guide”. [online], pp. 1-9. Available: www.proci.com/cmmma. [Sept. 25th, 2013].
[11] S. Yusof, and E. Aspinwall. “Total Quality Management Implementation Frameworks: comparison and Review”. Total Quality Management. Vol.11(3), pp. 281-294, 2000.
[12] F. M. Arain, L. S. Pheng. (2006). “Developers’ Views of Potential Causes of Variation Orders for Institutional Buildings in Singapore”. Architectural Science Review. Vol. 49(1), pp. 59-74.
[13] M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis, C. Weber. “Capability maturity model for software”. Verson 1.1 (CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, ADA 263403), Pittsburgh, P.A: Software engineering institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993.
[14] Y. Xu, A. P. C. Chan, J. F. Y. Yeung, D. W. M. Chan, S. Wang, Y. Ke. “Developing a risk assessment model for PPP projects in China: A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach” Journal of Automation in Construction”. Vol.19 (7), pp. 929-943, 2010.
[15] A. Akintoye, E. Fitzgerald. “Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating Practice”. Journal of construction management and economics, Vol.18, pp. 77- 89, 2000.
[16] R. Fellows, A. Liu, “Research Methods for Construction”. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 2008, PP.153- 154.
[17] J. Motwani, R. R. Subramanian, P. Gopalakrishna. (2005). “Critical Factors Successful ERP implementation: Exploratory Findings from Four Case Studies”. Computers in Industry. Vol.56, 529 – 544, 2005.
[18] S. P. Robbins, T. A. Judge. “Organisational Behaviour”. 12th Edition. Pearson Education, New Jersey. 2007, pp. 250 - 266
[19] P. Rayner, G. Reiss, G. “The programme management maturity model”. Wetherby: the programmemanagement group, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.