Supplier Selection Using Two Phases Model
Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP), Consistency Test, Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making (MCDM), Multi-Objective Problem (MOP).Abstract
Supply chain management interested in the selection of suppliers against multiple criteria rather than the single criterion as a cost only. These criteria may be quantitative, qualitative or both. To choose the best supplier, the criteria are being measured or weighted for ranking. The supplier selection problem is considered as a multi-decision problem and it can be solved by the Analytical Hierarchical Process. It allows the decision maker to structure such complex problems in the form of a hierarchy, or a set of integrated levels. In this paper, a mathematical model is combined with an analytical hierarchical process in two phases, the first phase starts by the weighted mathematical model from an exciting example, and the second phase makes the check and refines the result from the first phase by checking the consistency. And finally, a new ranking of the suppliers are obtained.
References
[2] L. H. Harps. “The Haves and the Have Nots, Supply Chain Practices for the New Millennium.” Inbound Logistics Journal, pp. 75-114,2000.
[3] R. Vera , and ME. Pullman. “An analysis of the supplier selection process.” Omega International Journal of Management Science, vol. 26, pp. 739–50, 1998.
[4] C. A. Weber, and J. R. Current. “A multi-objective approach to vendor selection.” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 68 , pp. 173–184,1993.
[5] S. H. Ghodsypour, and C. O’Brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming.” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 56 (57), pp. 199–212, 1998.
[6] F. Cebi and D. Bayraktar. “An integrated approach for supplier selection.” Logistics Information Management, vo.16 (6) , pp. 395–400, 2003.
[7] G. Wang, S. H. Huang and J. P. Dismukes. “Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology.” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 91, pp. 1–15, 2004.
[8] T. Y. Wang and Y.H. Yang.” A fuzzy model for supplier selection in quantity discount environments”, Expert Systems with Applications , vol. 36(10), pp. 12179–12187,2009.
[9] E. Timmerman. “An approach to vendor performance evaluation.” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management , vol. 22(4) , pp. 2–9,1986.
[10] Ng. Wang. “An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem.” European journal of operational research, vol. 186, pp. 1059-1067, 2008.
[11] T. L. Saaty.“An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper: Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Management Science journal, vol. 36, pp. 259-268, 1990.
[12] G. A. Miller. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review, vol. 63, pp. 81-97, 1965.
[13] T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who submit papers with this journal agree to the following terms.