Grain Yield and Yield Components of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.): As Influenced by Ascochyta Blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) Disease in the Highlands of Bale, Oromia

Authors

  • Addisu Tegegn Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Finfine, P.O.Box 81265, Ethiopia
  • Ermias Teshome Sinana Agricultural Research Center, Bale-Robe, P.O.Box 208, Ethiopia

Keywords:

Field pea, Yield loss, Ascochyta blight, AUDPC, Disease progress rate (r), Disease severity index.

Abstract

Field pea or “dry pea” (Pisum sativum L.) is an annual cool-season food legume which grows worldwide and is the second major pulse crop produced in the highlands of Bale next to Faba bean. The experiment was conducted for two consecutive cropping seasons; 2011/12 and 2012/13 at Sinana agricultural research center (SARC) on-station research site. The objective was to investigate the effect of Ascochyta Blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) disease on field pea yield and yield components. Local field pea cultivar was used with a fungicide Benomyl at a rate of 2.5kg/ha and four application schemes (spraying at 7 days, 14 days and 21 days interval and no fungicide spray) arranged in RCB Design with 3 replications. The logistic model (ln[y/ (1-y)]) was employed for estimation of the disease progression and the data were analyzed using SAS procedure. The association of disease parameters with yield and yield components were assessed using Regression and correlation techniques. ANOVA for disease severity, AUDPC and disease progress rate (r) have shown significant difference (P<0.0001) between treatments. The highest Ascochyta blight disease severity of 40.12% was recorded from non treated plot; while the lowest severity of 12.96%, was recorded from plot sprayed at 7 days interval. Similarly, the highest AUDPC of 1432.41%-days and the lowest (434.25%-days) were recorded from non-treated and plot sprayed at 7 days interval, respectively.

In the same way, the highest disease progress rate (r) of 0.036771 units-day-1 and the lowest r of -0.007652 units-day-1, respectively were recorded from non-treated plot and plot sprayed at every 7 days interval, respectively. ANOVA for yield and yield components have shown significant difference (P<0.05) between treatments. For all of the parameters considered, the highest values were recorded from plots sprayed every 7 days interval; while the lowest were from none sprayed plot. The highest (195.81g) and the lowest (175.23g) TKW were recorded from plots sprayed at 7 days interval and none treated plots, respectively. While the highest (2945.6 kg/ha) and the lowest (1873.5 kg/ha) grain yield were recorded from plots sprayed at 7 days interval and none treated plots, respectively. The linear regression of disease severity with grain yield revealed that there was highly significant difference (P<0.0001) between treatments. The estimated slope of the regression line obtained for Ascochyta blight disease severity was -39.08. Which indicates that, for every unit increase in Ascochyta blight disease severity there will be a reduction of 39.08 kg/ha in Field pea grain yield. Correlation analysis has shown that Ascochyta blight disease have highly significant strong negative correlation with grain yield (r = -0.84400, P<0.0001). Similarly, grain yield have significant strong negative correlation (r = -0.83841, P<0.0001) with AUDPC.

References

[1]. McKay K., Blaine Schatz and Gregory Endres, 2003. Field Crop Production. North Dakota State University Agriculture and University Extension Morrill Hall, P.O. Box 5562, Fargo, ND 58105-5562.
[2]. Kemal Ali, 2002. An Integrated Approach to Pest Management in Field Pea,(Pisum sativum L.) with Emphasis on Pea Aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). A PhD thesis submitted to University of Free State, Bloemfontein. 313p.
[3]. CSA, 2010. Agricultural Sample Survey 2009/10. Report on Area and Production of Crops Private Peasant Holdings, Meher Season.Addis Ababa. Statistical Bulletin no.446. vol.1.
[4]. Asfaw Telaye, Tesfaye Getachew and Beyene Demitsu, 1994. (eds). Cool season food legumes of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the first National Cool Season food Legume Review conference, 16-20 December 1993, ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria. 197p.
[5]. Dereje G. and Tesfaye B., 1994. Faba bean diseases in Ethiopia. pp. 328-345. In: Asfaw Tilaye et al. (Eds.). Cool-season Food Legumes of Ethiopia. Proc. First National Cool-season Food Legumes Review Conference, 16-20 December 1993, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ICARDA/IAR. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.
[6]. Nefo, Kedir; Geleto, Tilahun; and Aman, Allo (eds.), 2008. Fifteen years achievements: Oromia Agricultual Research Institute, Sinana Agricultural Research Center, Bale-Robe, Southeast Ethiopia.
[7]. Bernier, C.C., S.B. Hanounik, M.M. Hussein and H.A. Mohamed, 1993. Field manual of common faba bean diseases in the Nile Valley. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). Information Bulletin No. 3.
[8]. Wheeler, J.B., 1969. An introduction to plant diseases. Wiley, london, P. 347.
[9]. Campbell, C.L., Madden, V.L. 1990. Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
[10]. SAS Institute. 1998. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers, version 6.12 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
[11]. Van der Plank, J.E. 1963. Epidemiology of Plant Disease. New York and London Academic publishers. 206p.
[12]. Ateet Maharjan, Bhupendra Bhatta, Raju Prasad Acharya, Sagar G. C., and Swati Shrestha, 2015. Efficacy Assessment of Treatment Methods against Powdery Mildew Disease of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Caused by Erysiphe pisi var. pisi. World Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 3(6): 185-191.
[13]. Warkentin T. D., K.Y. Rashid and A.G. Xue, 1996. Fungicidal Control of Powdery mildew in Field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76:933-935.
[14]. Sharma K. D., 2000. Management of pea powdery mildew in trans-Himalayan region. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 70(1):50-52.
[15]. Shah, V. K., S. M. Shakya, D. M. Gautam and A. Shristava, 2007. Effect of sowing time and row spacing on yield and quantity of seed of pea crop at Rampur, Chitwan, IAAS Research Advances Vol. 1. Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 59-64.
[16]. Munjal, R. L., V. V. Chenulu and T. S. Hora, 1963. Assessment of losses due to powdery mildew (Erysiphe polygoni) on pea, Indian Phytopathology. 19: 260-267.
[17]. Fondevilla Rubiales, 2012. Powdery mildew control in pea. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 32 (2), pp.401-409.
[18]. Dengjin Bing, Yantai Gan and Tom Warkentin, 2011. Yields in mixtures of resistant and susceptible Field pea cultivars infested with powdery mildew-defining thresholds for a possible strategy for preserving resistance. Can. J. Plant Sci. 91: 873-880.
[19]. Dixon, G. R., 1987. Powdery mildew of vegetables and allied crops. In: D. M. Speaure. (eds), Powdery Mildew. London, UK: Academic Press. 565.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-18

How to Cite

Tegegn, A., & Teshome, E. (2017). Grain Yield and Yield Components of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.): As Influenced by Ascochyta Blight (Mycosphaerella pinodes) Disease in the Highlands of Bale, Oromia. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 35(1), 15–24. Retrieved from https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/3246

Issue

Section

Articles