Assessing of Feasible Independent Protection Layers (IPLs) using Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) for Flood Emergency Risk Management
Layer Protection Analysis (LOPA) which is a risk-based approach was chosen for this purpose to evaluate the frequency and consequence to help risk decision makers for emergency risk management. Many factors have been considered in order to complete this task to achieve an acceptable flood prevention and control measures. Firstly it needs to understand the event (for this case is flood) and the local conditions, prior to mitigate the major flood. In this research first the information on vulnerable flood areas and selection of feasible Independent Protection Layers (IPLs) for flood protection. Next using Event Tree Analysis (ETA) approach, incident scenario and determined consequences were assessed for the initiating event. The undesirable outcomes of the incident scenarios was calculated by a computer software namely Lopa4flood. The developed code provide with a facility to generate scenario or sequence of events for a set of safeguards. Each scenario consists of two elements; a pair of events namely initiating event and enabling condition for starting of a chain of events followed by a series of consequence if the chain of events continues without interruption. Data for initiating event, enabling condition and failures on demand of selected Independent Protection Layers (IPLs) must be entered into the software prior to run.
The software then display the calculated frequency (per year ) of the sequence events provided with the IPLs and the consequence impact characteristic in tabular form; whether it is ‘Acceptable’ (Green color), ‘Intermediate Range’ (Yellow color) or ‘Not Acceptable ‘(Red Color) for users to make decision. The advantages of the software is rapid, easy to use and friendly, in fact it provides options of feasible IPLs and their PFDs to stakeholders to assess an optimum combination IPLs for flood prevention and control measures in flood emergency risk.
Nizam Yatim, Mengimbau Bah Besar 1926, 1971 Utusan Online.(January, 2007) Laporan Khas., 15/01/2007.
Thampapillai, Dodo J., Musgrave, Warren F, Flood Damage Mitigation , A review of Structural and Unstructural Measurements and Alternative Decision Network. Water Resources Research, Vol 21, Issue 4, 44-424, 1985.
E. Mostert and S. J. Junier . The European Flood Risk Directive: Challenges For Research. Hydrology and Earth System Science Discuss, 6, 4961–4988, 2009.
Mohanad El-Harbawi1, Zatil Azhani Bt. Razali1, Sy M Faiz B Sy M Fuzi2 and Sa’ari Mustapha. Using Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) to Determine Safety Integrity Level (SIL) in the Process Industries.Journal of Applied Science, 10(24), 3310-3324, 2010.
Tuan Pah Rokiah Syed Hussain and Hamidi Ismail . Flood Frequency Analysis of Kelantan River Basin, Malaysia World Applied Sciences Journal 28 (12): 1989-1995, 2013.
UPEN. Draft Laporan Tebatan Banjir Menyeluruh Bagi Kawasan Limbangan Negeri Kelantan. 1989 http://repository.wwf.org.my/GovernmentReport/LapuranKajianTabatanBanjirMenyeluruhBagiKawasanLimbanganSungaiKelantan.pdf [March, 15, 2016]
Sebastiaan N. Jonkman, Matthijs Kok, and Johannes K. Vrijling. Flood Risk Assessment in the Netherlands: A Case Study for Dike Ring South Holland. Risk Analysis, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2008.
US Army Corps of Engineer. Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis. Reclamation Managing Water in the West , 2012. https://www.usbr.gov/ssle/damsafety/risk/BestPractices/Chapters/I-0-20150612.pdf [March, 15, 2016].
Matthias Buchecker, Dominika Maria Ogasa, Elisabeth Maidl. How well do the wider public accept integrated flood risk management? An empirical study in two Swiss Alpine valle. Environmental Science & Policy 55 ,309–317, 2016.
J Ramseh Babu. Layer of Protection Analysis – An effective tool in PHA. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.522.1335&rep=rep1&type=pdf, [Feb, 3,2016]
- There are currently no refbacks.