Cone Penetration Test Applications in Offshore Structure Geotechnical Projects

Authors

  • Salman Mashhadifarahani Subsea Engineering, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia
  • Ubiratan Stefano Paraguassu Subsea Engineering, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia.

Keywords:

Cone penetration test, CPT, offshore structure, Geotechnical projects, In situ test

Abstract

Today, due to presence of some limitations in experimental procedures particularly issues of intervention in traditional methods, applicability of in situ tests in geotechnical studies is growing rapidly. In situ tests are very fast became a useful and efficient tool in determination of the characteristics parameters of seabed underground layers for offshore design specifically in deep water area. Vane Test, Pressure Meter and Cone Penetration Test (CPT) are the most frequently used in situ tests for geotechnical offshore studies. The CPT apparatus is one of the most effective in situ testing machines in geotechnical studies as well. Continuous record of results in seabed, possibility of recording water pressure, possibility of recognizing layers with more than 5 cm thickness of liquefied soils, repeatability of tests results, standard method of testing, intervention reduction of soil and speed of carrying out test are the most important characteristics of the CPT machine. In present work, it is attempted to briefly describe the application of CPT machines in geotechnical offshore designs. In the other words, we present cone penetration test applications in offshore structure geotechnical projects.

 

References

[1] Ziaei Moayyed, R., “Correlation between results of field SPT and CPT tests and determination of the liquefaction potential by results of CPT tests”. MSc thesis, school of civil engineering, Iran University of science and technology, 1995.
[2] Ziaei Moayyed, R., “Using results of cone penetration test in geotechnical designs”. MSc seminar, school of civil engineering, Iran University of science and technology, 1995.
[3] Briaud, J. L., Tucker, Coyle, H. M. “Pressure meter, cone penetrmeter and foundation design”. Texas A&M university dohrt course notes, 1982.
[4] Griaed, J. L., Meyer, B., “In situ tests and their application in offshore design”. Conference on geotechnical practice in offshore engineering, 1982.
[5] Denk, W. E., Dunlap, W. A., Bryant, W. R., Milberger, L. J., “Whelan, T. J. A pressurized core barrel for sampling gas charged marine sediments”. Offshore technology conference, vol. 4, pp. 43-52, 1981.
[6] Dobry, R., Baziar, M., O’Rouke, T. D., Roth, B. L., Youd, T. L., “Chapter 4: liquefaction and ground failure in the imperial valley, southern California during 1979, 1981 and 1987 earthquakes”. Case studies of liquefaction and lifeline performance during past earthquakes, vol. 2: united states case studies, tech. NCEER 92-00002, T.D.O’Rouke and M. Hamada,1992.
[7] Marr, L. S., Endley, S. N., “Offshore geotechnical investigation using cone penetrometer”. Offshore technology conference, paper No. 4298, Houston, 1982.
[8] Mitchel, J. K., Tsegn, D. J., “Assessment of liquefaction potential by cone penetration resistance”, Proc, H. B., seed memorial symp., vol. 2, Bitech publishing, Vancouver, B. C., Canada, 1990.
[9] Quiros, G. W., Young, A. G., Pelletier. J., Chan, J. H. C., “Strength interpretation in the Gulf of Mexico: state of the art”. Geotechnical practice in offshore engineering, ASCE specially conference, Austin, 1983.
[10] Riaund, J. L., Miran, J., “The cone penetrometer test”, publication no. FHWA-Sa-91-043, 1992.
[11] Fobertson, P. K., Campanella, R. G., Wightman, A., “SPT-CPT correlations”, journal of geotechnical engineering, vol. 109 (11), pp. 1449-1457.
[12] Robertson, P. K., Campanella, R. G., “Liquefaction potential of sands using CPT”. Journal of geotechnical engineering, ASCE 111(3), pp. 384-403, 1985.
[13] Ruiter J., Beringen, F. L., “Pile foundations for large north sea structures”. Marine geotechnology, vol. 3, no. 3, 1979.
[14] Schmertmann, J. H., “Guidelines for cone penetration test: performance and design: US department of transportation”, federal highway administration. Report FHWA-TS-78-209, 1978.
[15] Shibata, T., Teparaksa, W., “Evaluation of liquefaction potentials of soils using cone penetration tests”. Soils and foundation, Tokyo, Japan, 28(2), 49-60, 1988.
[16] Stark, T. D., Olson, M., “Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories”. Journal of geotechnical engineering, ASCE, 127 (12), 856-569, 1995.
[17] Tokimatsu, K. J., Penetration tests for dynamic problems, 1988.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-19

How to Cite

Mashhadifarahani, S., & Paraguassu, U. S. (2015). Cone Penetration Test Applications in Offshore Structure Geotechnical Projects. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 11(1), 183–193. Retrieved from https://asrjetsjournal.org/index.php/American_Scientific_Journal/article/view/1041